599

It has fallen to me, the humor columnist, to endorse Harris for president (www.washingtonpost.com)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by vovo@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/politics@lemmy.world

57 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archive link

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 197 points 1 month ago

This should be the very last piece of journalism that any one takes seriously from the Washington Post.

Both them and the NYT have shown their asses when it comes to just being propaganda mouth-pieces.

We need to re-democratize our culture, and get away from this world of billionaire possession of our cultural expression. They didn't make it, and its not something they can own if we don't allow it. We need to stop taking outlets like WP or NYT seriously.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 123 points 1 month ago

NYT at least made the endorsement, the LA Times were the other cowards.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/30/opinion/editorials/kamala-harris-2024-endorsement.html

[-] madjo@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

It's a bit weird that it's behind a pay wall

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago

I'm not really sure what the New York Times has to do with this. WaPo is owned by a billionaire trying to hedge his bets if Trump wins and decides to take vengeance by breaking up Amazon.

NYT is fully independent.

[-] tja@sh.itjust.works 54 points 1 month ago

Not sure what you mean with fully independent, but Wikipedia says "Though The New York Times Company is public, all voting shares are controlled by the Ochs-Sulzberger Family Trust. "

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 28 points 1 month ago

It's owned by a wealthy family, and it's reflected in what they choose to report, and more importantly what not to report.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Heh.

[-] Beardwin@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I read the times nearly every day. Not sure what you mean by this. Can you expand? I find their reporting on trump to be pretty real. Their interview with John Kelly straight up calling trump a fascist is pretty damning. So…

[-] AugustWest@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

I can’t say for certain what they mean, but while their Trump coverage is solid, many people take issue with the way they are covering the Israel-Palestine conflict.

On another note, while I believe the John Kelly interview should be damning, if you believe it will make any difference you are living in a fantasy world.

[-] Beardwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

While I don’t necessarily disagree with either of your points, neither of them have anything to do with what I was responding to.

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They platform bad people with op ed, legitimizing the ideas

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

They don't consume the main stream media. And that's a great thing because then you can make up whatever you want about what they've said or not said in order to confirm whatever belief you have about them.

load more comments (9 replies)

[-] elliot_crane@lemmy.world 66 points 1 month ago

Alexandra Petri is courageous, Jeff Bezos is a scared little shit, spread the news.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That’s what our readers deserve and expect: that we are saying what we really think, reporting what we really see...

This is why I cancelled my subscription and switched to NYT. I need to be able to trust my news source, and I can't trust the post if all it took was a call from Bezos for them to bow and kneel.

[-] cabbage@piefed.social 19 points 1 month ago

And to lie about their reasons for doing so to their readers.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

This is why I cancelled my subscription and switched to NYT. I need to be able to trust my news source

Guess you're ignoring their genocide apologia and their constant pro-cop propaganda, then..

[-] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 month ago

Oh oh, don’t forget about vocalization of anti-transgender viewpoints: https://www.poynter.org/commentary/2023/new-york-times-bias-reporting-transgender-people/

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] resin85@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

I found the NYT's sanewashing of Trump irresponsible, so I took my WaPo subscription to The Guardian. It's a sad reflection on the US when a foreign paper has better reporting than any domestic source.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Guardian is my next choice if NYT doesn't impress. That said, I tip The Guardian very often, so I probably send more money their way than if I had a subscription.

[-] femtech@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago

https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/fact-check-new-york-times-publishes

load more comments (2 replies)

[-] BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 1 month ago

As one who mostly read the comics on newspapers when they were a thing, this could be the much needed endorsement for that target audience.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

"'He might forget' is not enough to hang a country on."

Its extremist views like this that are going to destroy our nation. ;p

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments

this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024

599 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19239 readers

2410 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News