If the reason for you wanting to avoid bitlocker is incompatibility with linux, you might want to reconsider. It's been many years since I had drives with bitlocker+ntfs, but they worked reasonably well back then with dislocker, so perhaps check that out before considering alternatives.
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)
linux4noobs
1356 readers
1 users here now
linux4noobs
Noob Friendly, Expert Enabling
Whether you're a seasoned pro or the noobiest of noobs, you've found the right place for Linux support and information. With a dedication to supporting free and open source software, this community aims to ensure Linux fits your needs and works for you. From troubleshooting to tutorials, practical tips, news and more, all aspects of Linux are warmly welcomed. Join a community of like-minded enthusiasts and professionals driving Linux's ongoing evolution.
Seeking Support?
- Mention your Linux distro and relevant system details.
- Describe what you've tried so far.
- Share your solution even if you found it yourself.
- Do not delete your post. This allows other people to see possible solutions if they have a similar problem.
- Properly format any scripts, code, logs, or error messages.
- Be mindful to omit any sensitive information such as usernames, passwords, IP addresses, etc.
Community Rules
- Keep discussions respectful and amiable. This community is a space where individuals may freely inquire, exchange thoughts, express viewpoints, and extend help without encountering belittlement. We were all a noob at one point. Differing opinions and ideas is a normal part of discourse, but it must remain civil. Offenders will be warned and/or removed.
- Posts must be Linux oriented
- Spam or affiliate links will not be tolerated.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
You can't choose the bitlocker password yourself right? If that's true, then that's why I avoid bitlocker.
Years ago, you could - I'm not sure what the situation is currently, but it would be extremely weird if they had removed this possibility entirely. You could see if the official command line tool does what you need. At least there seems to be an option to change the password.
Thank You.
What type of encryption do you need? NTFS can natively provide encryption, but it's going to be file level. LUKS2 is block device level, so the whole filesystem looks like one encrypted blob.
EDIT: And I don't know if Linux can do encrypted NTFS. If not, that wouldn't work for the shared storage.
kagis
Nope. Looks like there's a utility, ntfsdecrypt, to do decryption on a file-by-file basis, though. Probably not what you want, though.
EDIT2: This guy is recommending VeraCrypt, as it works with both. I've never used it, though, and the post is eight years old, so I suppose the situation could have changed.
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/306398/does-linux-work-well-with-encrypted-ntfs-drives
Linux doesn't support NTFS file-level encryption. Bitlocker using the recovery key sorta works but is still very new(look here for more info). Windows in turn can't read LUKS-encrypted devices. If you need to share your encrypted drive between Windows and Linux, I'd recommend VeraCrypt or one of the other TrueCrypt forks.
The one that asks password before boot (full encryption)
But veracrypt has it's own boot loader right? Won't it replace rEFInd?