this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
653 points (95.3% liked)

Curated Tumblr

6147 readers
5 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

Here are some OCR tools to assist you in transcribing posts:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pythonoob@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

This picture just describes the 'new math' that everyone bemoans.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This kind of feels like how I constantly get the "which word/shape/number (etc.) in this series is incorrect" questions on tests wrong. I severely overthink it. "Well, these four all have chloroplasts and this other one gains energy from photosynthesis via a symbiotic relationship with another organism, so it must be that one."

*Gets test back*

"Oh, it was the one that didn't live in a rain forest."

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I explained to a teacher one time this as my method, the get to ten version, and she looked confused as hell like why would anyone do that. She was cool with it though, gave me a whatever works for you kind of response.

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

9+7=10+7-1=16

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I like the way the second ADHD method is also a flip on the "seven ate nine" dad joke

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I think that third one down is actually how they’re teaching it at my kids’ schools now. It’s called “making a 10” I think, basically that same idea, add up to 10 first, then do the rest.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Me, bad at math: yeah they taught us that as a way to do in grade school.

[–] Emmie@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Okay this is nice and all but how do people do 3974* 438 mentally, without paper? And bigger and some outright freaks seem to do it in an instant

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For me:

3974 * 438 -> 4000 * 438 - 26*438 ->
4000 * 438 - 26*440 - 26*2 -> 4000 * 438 - 20*440 - 6*440 - 26*2

And so on, and I'd do some of the intermediate calculations as I go (e.g. 20*440 and 6*440).

But that's only really needed if I need a precise answer. If I can get away with an estimate, I'll simplify it even more:

4000 * 430 ~= 43 * 4 * 10000 = 86 * 2 + 10000 = 1,720,000

Actual answer: 1,740,612. 4000 * 440 would be easier (I like multiplying 4s), but I know it would overshoot, so I round one up and the other down. Close enough for something like estimating how much a large quantity of something kind of expensive would cost (i.e. if my company gave everyone a hot tub or something).

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›