Got lucky with a clear night.
What did you use to capture/process this?
this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
91 points (98.9% liked)
Astrophotography
3043 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to !astrophotography!
We are Lemmy's dedicated astrophotography community!
If you want to see or post pictures of space taken by amateurs using amateur level equipment, this is the place for you!
If you want to learn more about taking astro photos, check out our wiki or our discord!
Please read the rules before you post! It is your responsibility to be aware of current rules. Failure to be aware of current rules may result in your post being removed without warning at moderator discretion.
Rules
- I | Real space images only.
-
Astrophotography refers to images of astronomical objects or phenomena exclusively.
-
~~Images that show objects or people below the Kármán Line (100km) will be removed.~~ We won't be enforcing this rule for now, but as the community grows eventually we will split and have a separate space for just landscape astro.
-
Images must be an accurate representation of a real astronomical object.
- II | Original and Amateur Content Only
-
Image posts can only be images that you have captured and processed yourself, or discussion about capturing and/or processing your own images.
-
Images acquired from public sources, professional observatories, or other professional services are not allowed.
-
If you have done a drastic alteration or reprocessing of a prior submission, you may repost your edit - but only after a minimum of one week has passed.
- III | Post Types
-
Image posts are to link directly to the image, not to landing pages, personal galleries, blogs, or professional sites. Link to these in the comments. (AstroBin and Imgur, are allowed)
-
Questions are welcome here for the time being.
-
Links to blogs, articles or external websites should be interesting and promote discussion about amateur astrophotography.
- IV | Titles
- All image posts should just include include the name of the object being photographed. Extra info such as equipment, it being your first image, or other information should go in a comment along with your acquisition info. Please see this page for more details.
If your post is removed, try reposting with a different title. Don't hesitate to message the mods if you still have questions!
- V | Acquisition and Processing Information
-
All submitted images must include acquisition and processing details as a top-level comment. All posts without this information may be given a warning, and if not updated will be removed.
-
This includes the telescope, mount, camera, accessories, and any other pieces of equipment you used to capture the image.
-
You must also include processing details, i.e. the programs you used and a general rundown of the workflow/processes you used within those programs. “Processed in Photoshop” is not enough.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Both are shot on a Sony a7r (2013), the first was on a 35mm lens at f/4, ISO 640, 10s exposure. The second was with a 400mm lens at f/6.5, ISO 6400, 2s exposure. Both images were processes using RawTherapee to fix the contrast, colour, etc.
The top half captures exactly how it felt to see it from home with the naked eye, the bottom half with my binoculars.
Are you in a very dark place? Might go hunting this evening as I didn't think it would be visible to the naked eye.
edit: Found a superb tracker here. You can stick in your location and time and it tells you where to look:
I live between a city and a suburb, shielded from a lot of the light by hills, there's still quite a bit of glare behind my back but no lights towards the western horizon, which is where the comet just happens to be.
You can just see it by eye in the burbs, if you can get a a little bit outside of town it should be easy to spot.
I'm rural but the city is directly west, between me and comet. You can sort of see the glare in the photo. Definitely not naked eye visible where I was.
Fantastic!
