Technology

59415 readers

1166 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

469

Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 needs 64GB of RAM for ideal performance — oddly, the game install size is only 30GB (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

96 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 2) 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] potentiallynotfelix 3 points 1 month ago

flightgear better

[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it fun to play?

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

Defines: fun.

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Is there any reason to choose MSFS over Flightgear other than simply being unaware of the latter's existence?

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 5 points 1 month ago

I mean, yes, as I’m sure you know already. Flightgear is a fine product and lots of respect to the contributors, but the support around MSFS, the level of detail and whole host of other factors make MSFS the one to beat; even if the flight model of XPlane is probably a tad better.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments