For @Civility purposes, nothing from active users, please
thx Ulysses you know how easy it is for me to go off
still a strange mix of sad and relieved to not see myself in the comments
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
Posts must ask a question.
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
For @Civility purposes, nothing from active users, please
thx Ulysses you know how easy it is for me to go off
still a strange mix of sad and relieved to not see myself in the comments
There was a user that, before getting banned, declared that every single living human being alive on Earth right now should not exist because no one had the benefit of a pre-conception device on hand to somehow determine each individual's consent to exist before they started to exist.
I mean, is this an uncommon thought? Isn't that what Mary Shelley's Frankenstein is about, for example?
Whether it is uncommon or not, demanding that people obtain the consent of a nonexistent entity in order to create life is at best ontologically confused and at worst deeply hostile