this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

955 readers
364 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

She was uncomfortable with the letter — it felt like something political was going on, she said — and she said she wasn’t sure she wanted to register again.

With Republican officials around the country like Allen putting a fresh focus on preventing noncitizens from voting — which is already illegal and rare — it’s naturalized Americans like Esternita Watkins who will be most affected by such voter roll purges, voting rights advocates and attorneys say.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 4 points 1 year ago

What an accidental unintentional result

[–] echo@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

Working as planned.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

“Repeated requests to the United States Federal Government for assistance in obtaining a listing of noncitizens currently residing in Alabama were denied," he said. "This lack of cooperation led my team and I to approach the issue differently."

so like, the federal government wasn't willing to assist with potentially breaking voting laws, so they decided the best idea was to do it anyway? Interesting. That being said, it looks like the intent was to prevent non-citizens from registering, but like the fact they didn't already have the information of who was a citizen vs non-citizen at hand is really weird

At least it's easy enough to fix, I figured it would be something that you couldn't fix on voting day, which is where most of the false positives will be discovered.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

It's not the fixing part, it's the intimidation part. The one person felt like she was going to get in trouble or be "watched" if she tried to fix it.