310
Cyclists Break Far Fewer Road Rules Than Motorists, Finds New Video Study (www.forbes.com)
submitted 1 year ago by frankPodmore@slrpnk.net to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
109 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Some interesting stuff here, including links to more studies showing similar results in different countries.

The summary is that the reason motorists break more laws is that speeding is so common.

I don't think this is because motorists are all evil and cyclists are all saints. Probably, the reason motorists break speed limits is that it can be relatively difficult to keep cars below the speed limit. It's all too easy to absentmindedly speed up. It's also, perhaps becuase of this, widely seen as socially acceptable to break the speed limit (speaking anecdotally).

One interesting thing here, which may not surprise regular readers of Fuck Cars, is that better cycling infrastructure leads to less lawbreaking by cyclists. As is often the case, it's the design of roads and cities that changes behaviour, not abstract appeals to road users to be sensible!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 year ago

So, it appears that when giving everyone equal infrastructure, motorists are still awful at getting around.

The reason Dutch cyclists don't break laws is that there's little reason to. Their traffic signals work for cyclists, their paths work for cyclists, there's no reason to speed, etc.

Compare that to most cities in North America, and "breaking the law" for a cyclist means not wanting to wait 10 minutes at the same red light because there aren't any cars to trigger a change to green. Or riding on sidewalks because nobody feels safe on roads with semi-trucks and pickup trucks refusing to give them any space.

When motorists break the law, it's because they are impatient or just don't know how to drive. When cyclists do it, it's to either be safe or because the infrastructure is so poor that it makes normal cycling behaviour seem like a crime.

[-] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's also a level of absurdity to cycling laws. E.g., in the UK if I:

  • Approach a red light
  • Dismount
  • Wheel my bike just over the stop line
  • Remount and cycle away

That's legal. But! If I:

  • Approach a red light
  • Stay on my bike
  • Cycle very slowly over the stop line
  • Continue to cycle away

That's a crime.

The 'Stop on red' rule was obviously designed for cars and then slapped onto bicycles, a category of vehicle for which it makes very little sense.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

The ‘Stop on red’ rule was obviously designed for cars and then slapped onto bicycles, a category of vehicle for which it makes very little sense.

Proof: intersections of multi-use paths don't have stop signs and don't need them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

As a UK cyclist I can see that stopping at a red light definitely does make sense. I don't want to hit pedestrians and other road users who have been given a green light to cross my path.

[-] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

You're no more dangerous cycling at 3kph than you are wheeling your bike at 3kph, but one of those things is illegal if you do it over a stop line, regardless of anything else you do once you're over the stop line. That's the absurdity.

[-] EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I say make them both illegal so the rules are more predictable and easy to understand.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The study in the article is from Denmark though. They never mentioned Dutch cyclists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] potpotato@artemis.camp 34 points 1 year ago

it can be relatively difficult to keep your car under the speed limit

Hard disagree. This is like saying it’s difficult to stay off you phone while driving — it’s just a shitty habit that can be corrected.

[-] magiccupcake@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It is in america. Roads are too wide and straight, which sends subtle signals that its safe to go faster than the speed limit.

This is especially bad on roads that have had their speed limit reduced without changing anything else.

I blame American road designers for speeding more, because we should be designing roads that reflect the speed we want them to drive.

Though the best solution to speeding is just removing cars, but I doubt that will happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

https://youtu.be/bglWCuCMSWc?si=8786kjY70qqai4V2

Yes, drivers absolutely should be actively driving, but they don't. I've watched how a lot of people drive over the years, and the vast majority of drivers aren't actively checking their mirrors, and gauges every few seconds. Road designers have decades of data on how to subconsciously make us slow down. It won't stop all speeding, but it will drastically reduce it in the US.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] frankpodmore@social.coop 24 points 1 year ago

@frankPodmore@slrpnk.net One interesting thing here is that it seems that cyclists, whether breaking the law or sticking to it, are often doing so out of self-preservation. If you're turning left at a busy junction with a bike lane, jumping the red might actually be safer than waiting for it to change. A good example of a perverse incentive!

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Granted it's not all the time, but I do agree that a lot of the time, the rule breaking is incentivized by cars' problematic driving and not sharing the road well. If cars were on a whole more friendly with cyclists and knew the proper rules as well, it probably wouldn't happen as often.

[-] frankpodmore@social.coop 9 points 1 year ago

@pjhenry1216 I think the key thing is better cycling infrastructure. Most people would do almost anything to avoid hitting someone with their car, but it still happens all too often because of poorly designed roads

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 year ago

(Yes, this is me replying to this post on Mastodon. Didn't realise that it would show up like this!)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] oo1@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

we've got a new cycle lane with dedicated lights near me - though only activated by a beg-button.
except you can press the button sall you want ant it'll stay on red all the time.

unfortunately due to the concrete separator i can't nip over into the main lane and use that lane on green.
so i just have to run the red. almost every bike trip i make is lawbreaking for me.

[-] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

I break laws cycling almost daily. While infrastructure is fairly good in my country, there still are a lot of dangerous points. Breaking the law is necessary to get to your destination safely.

[-] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Is that a dare?

I broke the speed limit on my bicycle once. For literally seconds before the speed limit was increased in the next road section XD

[-] unfnknblvbl@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

I've broken it a few times in my younger years when I could flex hard on my fixie in steep gearing.

I stopped trying after a motorist pulled out from a side street in front of me and I slammed into the side of his car at 60+kph. Completely destroyed the custom forks I had commissioned for the bike so I could run a disc brake specifically to avoid that happening :(

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Hah, speeding for one.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
310 points (90.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

9773 readers
112 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
uthredii@lemmy.ml
uthredii@beehaw.org