77
submitted 5 months ago by Crying4625@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I want to revive an old Lenovo laptop with an AMD A6 2.6GHz and 4GB ram, what would be the best option for a DE?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Trent@lemmy.ml 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I usually go with Xfce.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 months ago

PSA no matter how light your distro, any modern app or webpage will use all that power

[-] eugenia@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago

That's fast enough to run the latest Linux Mint with Cinnamon. I have two laptops with the exact same cpu speed (passmark score) and 4 GB of ram. With 2 GB swap file you will be in business.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Zier@fedia.io 12 points 5 months ago

I'm running Kubuntu on less than that on a desktop and it works just fine.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 months ago

If you are still using X, get Fluxbox, very lightweight, requires some config, but that is fairly easy.

[-] Pacmanlives@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

+1 for Fluxbox!

It’s such an underrated WM

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 9 points 5 months ago

If you don’t need a full desktop environment, check-out IceWM.

I recently checked-out Trinity ( essentially KDE 3 modernized ) and was surprised how decent it was. I used it in Q4OS but it may be available in your distro.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I use IceWM on antiX. Seems to be a good mix of low resource usage and aesthetics.

[-] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

LXQt, XFCE Or a window manager, they’re all lightweight.

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago

Its fairly difficult to find "up-to-date" performance / RAM comparisons of Linux Desktop environments, but here's a decent one from 2019 comparing memory usage of different Ubuntu flavors.

The most surprising thing is that despite KDE Plasma's reputation as being more ram-hungry, it actually used less ram than XFCE, meaning its developers have been making performance a focus.

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago

Technically not a DE, but I like plain openbox.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cerement@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 months ago
  • the big guns: Gnome or Plasma
  • the middle tier: Xfce or LXQt
  • the lightweights: tiling window managers (and there’s a LOT to choose from)
  • the alternative crowd: Mate, Cinnamon, Regolith
[-] Crying4625@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

I think gnome and KDE Plasma are just too heavy. And I would use a WM if it was for me, in fact that what I use in my daily driver but it is for someone not that tech savvy. I may check one from the alternative crowd tho. Thanks for the answer

[-] folkrav@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

I seem to remember hearing about Plasma having similar memory usage to XFCE. Don’t quote me on that lol

[-] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago

plasma is surprisingly performant

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago

OP asked for desktop env, and tiling window managers are... Well only window managers and not desktop environments...

[-] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I like MATE. It feels familiar. (I’m a GNOME user 😅)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sina@beehaw.org 5 points 5 months ago

A window manager like i3 or Openbox. If you are curious what that's like, then try out Bunsenlab Linux. (XFWM4 is also a great choice, but it requires some know how to properly rip out the rest of Xfce, like the relatively heavy desktop and the panel)

[-] kbal@fedia.io 4 points 5 months ago

Does Xfce count as light? It's got plenty of features. Should fit in 4gb well enough though.

[-] RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago

If xfce doesnt count as light I don't know what would

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] b0rlax@beehaw.org 3 points 5 months ago
[-] geoma@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

I would go mx linux fluxbox

[-] Deckweiss@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

There are many options, but I'd say on those specs anything will run more or less fine with some tweaks/settings.

Personally I would go with KDE Plasma, because I feel most comfortable with it. It can be pretty light on system ressources when configured properly. Disable all the visual stuff (animations, blur, anti aliasing) and some of it's background modules (baloo and some other stuff that you personally don't need).

But you should take the one you are familiar with and find out how you can tweak it to be more light. Cheers

[-] Crying4625@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

I have tested KDE plasma in my main pc for a few weeks now and the ram consumption seems pretty high and have too many options. I'm looking for something light and easy to use (not many options) since the pc is going to be used by someone not very tech savvy.

[-] Deckweiss@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Measuring RAM usage is extremely tricky, because programs will use more than they need, if there is lots of unused RAM available. Check out https://www.linuxatemyram.com if you want to learn more.

For me KDE Plasma uses over a gig on my main PC after a fresh boot. But it also ran perfectly fine on a 512MB ancient laptop.

[-] ogeist@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

XFCE or LxQT but i have a preference for XFCE if it is for normal use.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaypatelani@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Moksha Desktop environment Bodhi Linux

[-] jaypatelani@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Or Fedora Budgie Edition

[-] schwim@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago

I love OB with tint2 and conky , no de needed.

[-] Crying4625@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

If it was for me I could use something like that. But I don't think the person I'll give the pc to would be able to lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] phanto@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

I have a thumb drive with Mint Mate installed on it and it runs fine on a 4gb i5 - 3rd gen.

[-] robber@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

Does not answer your question, and someone already mentioned it in a thread, but don't forget zram when only 4GBs are available.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Xfce, LXQt or just install JWM and enjoy the 30 Mb idle RAM usage

[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I'd go with XFCE

[-] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago
[-] dasenboy@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Probably lxqt. https://lxqt-project.org/ Very lightweight yet a full-on DE (minus bells and whistles). Found on most Linux distros repositories.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ssm@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

For something with that little memory, I would use a minimal window manager; you'll want every megabyte of memory if you want to have any chance at running something like a javascript-capable browser without constantly hammering swap. fvwm, cwm, jwm, and ratpoison are all small window managers I enjoy; but do your own research into what window manager is the best for you.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

Your biggest problem is going to be the 4 GB of RAM. Saving a few hundred megs on the DE will help but not much. If you run a web browser ( and I cannot imagine using a computer without one ) that RAM is going to fill up fast.

Honestly, I would use a 32 bit distro on that hardware.

Q4OS with Trinity, Antix, Adelie, and DSL are all pretty decent options.

[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 5 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago

KDE plasma. From my experience it uses less resources than lxqt and xfce and works out of the box while lxqt and xfce required extra work to get wifi, screen brightness controls and audio working. I can have 10+ tabs in a chromium based browser open without lag on an old laptop with 2GB ram and 1.33 - 1.83GHz 4 core intel atom from 10 years ago.

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

s/chromium/Firefox/g

[-] gi1242@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

honestly they are all pretty good at this point. start with the default ur distro supports. if that isn't to your taste try kde/plasma, gnome or lxde

[-] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

Is the A6 from 2017/18? Should be fine with anything. My wife's laptop is from 2010/11. I tried all the DEs because of the lightness claims, I found GNOME worked the best, and it is super peppy running NixOS.

I asked online why GNOME would perform better than what is assumed a lighter DE, and a comouter dude says GNOME goes and gets everything it needs and caches it when you launch something so retrieval is faster in the app, KDE loads stuff on demand as it is asked for so a alow CPU and HDD hinderes KDE for me.

if you can afford it, by 4 more gigs of RAM

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago

Get an SSD as it will make your life way better

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
77 points (96.4% liked)

Linux

48654 readers
359 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS