560

32 percent of Americans believe a military regime or authoritarian leader would be a good way of governing the country. (newrepublic.com)

submitted 3 months ago by oxjox@lemmy.ml to c/politics@lemmy.world

221 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Meanwhile, 44 percent backed the American tradition of competing branches of government as a model, if sometimes “frustrating,” system.

Why would people want to live under an authoritarian’s thumb? It’s rooted, experts say, in a psychological need for security—real or perceived—and a desire for conformity, a goal that becomes even more acute as the country undergoes dramatic demographic and social changes. People also like to obey a strong leader who will protect the group—especially if it is the “right” group whose interests will be protected. Recall the Trump supporter who, during the 2019 government shutdown, complained, “He’s not hurting the people he needs to be hurting.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 31 points 3 months ago

Can’t they just say Trump supporters?

[-] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

They could but that would be wrong since the split is only 4% between the left and right (L-25% and R - 29%).

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

Nope. 48 percent of Republicans, 38 percent of independents, and 29 percent of Democrats.

[-] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 months ago

I am literally reading from the article... And even with your numbers democrats are still quite terrible...

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Dude… I quoted that FROM the article.

“A PRRI study last October found that 38 percent of Americans (and 48 percent of Republicans, 38 percent of independents, and 29 percent of Democrats) think the country needs a leader who will “break some rules if that’s what it takes to set things right.”

Stop making shit up.

[-] CableMonster@lemmy.ml -4 points 3 months ago

Did you notice that your numbers dont match the headlines? The headline and main part of the article is about the pew study which I quoted from.

Stop making shit up.

[-] JimSamtanko@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

So…. You didn’t even read your own article. That’s fucking embarrassing. Maybe read it. See for yourself that I copied those numbers DIRECTLY from it.

Jesus man…. You really should delete your shit.

this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024

560 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19159 readers

4476 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News