62
submitted 1 year ago by sik0fewl@kbin.social to c/canada@lemmy.ca

A housing system that serves all but one group is not in a state of crisis; it is one based on structural inequality and economic exploitation.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] narF@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

I remember reading that city taxes should change from being based on the value of the building to only be based on the value of the land. This way it discourages only single-family homes.

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

The principle of "I want to make money" already discourages SFH. Unfortunately, that's offset by zoning laws that inhibit the ability to make money.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Cities should already want less single family homes. They get more taxes from 120 apartment owners than they do from 12 SFH owners.

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Restrictive zoning already does more than enough to ensure single-family zoning.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
62 points (91.9% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
447 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS