Public Health

360 readers

1 users here now

For issues concerning:

Public Health
Global Health
Health Systems & Policy
Environmental Health
Epidemiology
etc.

🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.

Related Communities

Medical Community Hub
Medicine
Medicine Canada
Premed
Premed Canada
Public Health (📍)

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)

Rules

Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.

Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content

Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

otter@mander.xyz

otter@lemmy.ca

New Zealand's world-first smokefree legislation 'goes up in smoke': a setback in ending the tobacco epidemic (www.sciencedirect.com)

submitted 4 months ago by otter@lemmy.ca to c/publichealth@mander.xyz

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Highlights

Aotearoa New Zealand formerly enacted revolutionary tobacco control measures

Reforms included introducing a generational ban on tobacco products

To achieve an equitable smokefree future, Māori leadership and partnership were critical in implementing effective tobacco control measures

The planned smokefree reform was repealed by the sixth National-led coalition government

Economic concerns, autonomy, and potential illicit tobacco trade were key justifications for the repeal

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

[deleted]

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Just like it’s your choice to pay more taxes to support a healthcare system coping with a society full of downtrodden sickly nicotine addicted smokers.

We have decided that you cant own an automatic weapon because the risk to yourself and cost to society is too great. By the same logic we should ban smoking, whose cost to society, in practice, is far far greater.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you're saying we should regulate sugar and alcohol next, yeah? I'm on board.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

alcohol and sugar are already regulated to various degrees. you need to be a certain age for alcohol. you wont get served if you're shitfaced. The cost itself is often prohibitive. Some countries have sugary drink taxes, and/or don't allow them to be sold in school cafeterias

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

You're so right, we should double the drinking age and raise costs 1000%. And the sugar should have a 1000% tax.

Good thinking. this will prevent people who already make poor decisions because their brain isn't developed yet from consuming alcohol and making the problem worse. Drunk driving being a hobby is fucking disgraceful.
And sugar wont be is ALL of our food!

Win-win!

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Choice is good but only if you're the one smoking then?

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 months ago

The correct path is to disallow the sale of the stuff. Its like with weed. You should let people grow it, but when you start allowing the sale, you will get big shitty corporations trying to make it as addictive as possible.