science

21849 readers

226 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

172

submitted 1 year ago by ooli@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Audalin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is not to say that Jung wasn't a genius. Jung was THE BOMB DIGGIDITY (which, by the way, I wish was an official term in the Oxford dictionary).

If they love Jung so much (which I agree they should because Jung was amaaaaazing), why don't they honor him by using the spelling he actually used?

Love etymological articles with unreliable narrators.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Unreliable narrators keep us all in check, they make us question what we believe or know to be true.