357
Basically the extent of my IPv6 knowledge (lemmy.world)
submitted 4 months ago by renzev@lemmy.world to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Template source: https://web.archive.org/web/20210304000634/https://www.government.nl/topics/coronavirus-covid-19/visiting-the-netherlands-from-abroad/checklist

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] thirteene@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

So, yes a few pieces of land mass tech such as smart road or solar paneling and we hit the theoretical limit of IPv6. And we currently dont need the addresses. So glad that you agree

[-] aBundleOfFerrets@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Why is your smart road using significantly more than a billion addresses (understatement) per square meter?

[-] thirteene@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This thread is a dumpster fire, routing infrastructure, solar panel addresses, we are adding this to EVERYTHING WE ALREADY HAVE that is growing exponentially. I work on an L7 support team, regular users are clueless on how this stuff is setup and apparently have strong stupid opinions. Anyone still reading disable ipv4 in your home network and try to roll forward. You will fail, and finite numbers are finite.

this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
357 points (96.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

19488 readers
212 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Feyter@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
BurningTurtle@programming.dev
pylapp@programming.dev