1698
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sentient_Modem@lemm.ee 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I could throw a site together if the community is willing to help curate the data.

From what I read here are some keys to follow:

Year Taught: Year of irrelevance: Country: Fact:

I could throw a form together for submissions to feed this site. Thoughts?

[-] TheBig2023Meltdown@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

You'd probably need to verify all submissions

Unless you throw an LLM into the mix

Or maybe there's already some resources giving you all debunked facts with their dates

[-] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 months ago

You believe an LLM can be used to distinguish facts from fiction? I wonder up to which year that misconception was taught in school.

The whole point of LLMs is, to convince their users that the "facts" they generate are actual facts.

[-] TheBig2023Meltdown@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

They can browse the web, and I never meant it would be 100 accurate just easier. Don't think this is going to be a mission critical website

[-] Ragnarok314159@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago

That just it, these “facts” won’t be on the web for stuff approximately 2005 and before. No where on the web is the racist and homophobic shit I was taught in the 80’s and 90’s listed on some wiki.

LLM’s are mostly useless anyways at distinguishing real information, they are just shit summary tools and poor search engines.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

LLM is plausible deniability!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
1698 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5162 readers
998 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS