0
()
submitted a long while ago by @ to c/@
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 47 points 4 days ago

A Canon printer. Not just a simple one, but a big (wide) one with real ink tanks, about 20 years ago.

Under Linux, I could only access basic printing services with that, and this only by using a default driver not made by Canon that happened to work. So I contacted Canon to get a proper user manual to create a proper device driver for this (something I could have done without problems), and basically got the answer that they would not support this, as "open source is theft of intellectual property". They also had some very choice words about Linux in general.

I assumed I just got an asshole on the phone, so when I attended Cebit a short time later (back then the biggest trade fair in Europe for things like that), I went to the Canon booth, explained my issue, and basically got the same reply. So I sold the Canon printer and bought an HP one. At least HP supported Linux and supplied working drivers. Sadly, they have really gone down the drain since that, so the next printer will be a different brand again...

[-] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

Try brother. They're usually quite good, though I've only had their laser printers.

[-] 50MYT@aussie.zone 3 points 3 days ago

I have a brother color laser + scanner. Love it.

I've had it for 8 years now, and so far it's only on its second set of toners etc.

The only warning I give to brother printer owners is don't leave them on. The capacitors in them aren't the best and your printer will either not turn on without a long power off, or like mine it will turn on and off randomly all day and night.

So now I only turn it on at the wall when I need it, and unplug it after

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

It will probably be either a Brother Inkbenefit or an Epson Ecotank model.

[-] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

My last Epson is a model from 2009 and still somehow works perfectly. Every Canon I've owned was garbage.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Well, the question for me back then was printing wide, so the selection was quite limited from the start. And laser was completely out of the equation, as anything printing wider than 21cm was industrial (size of a bus and price of a house) back then.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

Ink stinks, but I'll condone the toner. Inkjets are so unreliable compared to lasers. Good luck, but I worry you're stacking the deck against yourself a bit with the ink and would hate to see you lose here.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Don't worry, I consider lasers, too.

load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Jan 0001
0 points (NaN% liked)

0 readers
0 users here now

founded a long while ago