Android 12 took up 700MB RAM, leaving some space for non-sytem apps on lower end smartphones.
Android 13 takes up easily 1.2GB, leaving almost nothing at the benefit of having a somewhat "snappier" interface
Lower end phones usually already have 8 GB RAM (example: Galaxy A54 5G, 300€ new).
I would consider the A-Series of Samsung "mid-range". I know you said "lower" and "mid-range" is lower than "high-end", but I suspect tetris11's issue mostly applies to "low-end" phones. Something like a Motorola Moto G Play 2024
You consider that a good thing... Phones shouldn't have this much RAM.
Why would higher RAM be a bad thing? That's like saying phones shouldn't have more storage, faster processors, better camera, ...
Sure, they worked before that already. But isn't technological advancement still good?
Android 12 took up 700MB RAM, leaving some space for non-sytem apps on lower end smartphones.
Android 13 takes up easily 1.2GB, leaving almost nothing at the benefit of having a somewhat "snappier" interface
Lower end phones usually already have 8 GB RAM (example: Galaxy A54 5G, 300€ new).
I would consider the A-Series of Samsung "mid-range". I know you said "lower" and "mid-range" is lower than "high-end", but I suspect tetris11's issue mostly applies to "low-end" phones. Something like a Motorola Moto G Play 2024
You consider that a good thing... Phones shouldn't have this much RAM.
Why would higher RAM be a bad thing? That's like saying phones shouldn't have more storage, faster processors, better camera, ...
Sure, they worked before that already. But isn't technological advancement still good?