1659
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago

I don't like that first article, it gives contradicting information about the energy usage per image, saying 0.29kWh/image then saying 0.29kWh/1000 images.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 6 points 6 days ago

The article is way, waaaaaaay off. My PC generates images at a rate of about one per second (SDXL Turbo) with an Nvidia 4060 Ti which uses 160W (~12W when idle). Let's assume I have it generate images constantly for one hour:

  • 3,600 images per 0.16kWh
  • About 22,500 images per hour.

In other words, generating a single image is a trivial amount of power.

[-] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

How are you able to generate images so quickly? When I tried to run Stable Diffusion on my nominally comparable GPU (RX6800M, similar to 6700XT, 12GB VRAM), it took over a minute to get halfway to generating a medium sized image before my entire computer crashed.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

Nvidia cards are so much faster than AMD for Stable Diffusion it's ridiculous.

That and Turbo like that other person said ๐Ÿ‘

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
1659 points (96.8% liked)

White People Twitter

4458 readers
1148 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS