692
Sounds great in theory (programming.dev)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fiah@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

a) you don’t have the ability to understand what the client actually needs

the client doesn't understand either. This I have had to learn to accept and not blame the client for, it's OK and we'll figure it out together

b) if you over-architect your solution

we can't figure out what we actually need by overarchitecting something to death. If and when you find you've coded yourself into a corner because you didn't architect well enough 6 months ago, then congratulations it seems like what you're doing is good because you've made enough progress to actually need a better architecture

obviously I'm oversimplifying and people more experienced than me understand better how to walk the tightrope between unmaintainable spaghetti and an overengineered mess, but me, I try to keep shit as simple as possible because you never know

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
692 points (97.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

32503 readers
496 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS