this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)

Éire / Ireland

1040 readers
1 users here now

An Irish community in the fediverse.

Check before posting.
If the topic was posted in the last 24 hours, add new articles in the comments instead of creating a new post.

Link to a genuine source. Screenshots of news articles are only permitted when accompanied by a link. Keep the original headline.

Weather & alerts: https://www.met.ie/

Health Service: https://www.hse.ie/

Central Statistics Office https://cso.ie/

National Broadcasters: https://www.tg4.ie/en/https://www.rte.ie/

Radio Stations: https://irishradiolive.com/

Imeachtaí i nGaillimh https://feilire.com/

Contact Your TD https://www.contactyourtd.ie/

Irish Dictionaries: https://www.focloir.ie/en/https://www.teanglann.ie/en/http://www.potafocal.com/fbg/

Irish language Courses: https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/irish-languagehttps://community-courses.memrise.com/community/courses/english/https://www.duolingo.com/learn

Pollen levels: https://www.met.ie/forecasts/pollen

Parterend with: !askhistorians@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tomorrow (Thursday) EU governments are to vote on a bill (officially called “child sexual abuse regulation” but known as “chat control”) that would require automated searches in and disclosure of private chats, including end-to-end encrypted chats, that might contain illegal photos or videos.

Further Reading:

https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/chat-control-politicians-industry-raise-alarm-over-eus-unprecedented-messenger-surveillance-plans/

https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/council-to-greenlight-chat-control-take-action-now/

https://stopchatcontrol.eu/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] governorkeagan 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Exactly this! Take it from someone who has worked in content moderation (including CSEM, amongst other things). What is being proposed will not help fight this battle.

[–] Kiernian@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

And what kills me is that continually trotting out "for the children" as an automatic "gotcha" watchword lessens the public concern for actual children and muddies the proverbial pond with regards to the actual effective/productive methods for actually protecting children.

There should be a rule about using "think of the children"/"support our troops" where you have to actually be doing something that directly and proportionally affects the group you're referencing in a positive manner commensurate with the amount of money that's being funnelled into the effort.

That and no shilling for cancer research donations just to spend it on yachts and advertising or whatever.