288
submitted 4 weeks ago by Alteon@lemmy.world to c/usa@midwest.social
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] invertedspear@lemm.ee 2 points 4 weeks ago

I think the only downside to this is that if I had expendable cash already liquid so no paper trail, and I was a juror, and I wanted the defendant to get in even more trouble, I could claim the cash was a bribe and get it back with no risk. It would also make laundering money easier as any claim of bribery instantly cleans up the source of it. And if the designated grunt does his time and doesn’t talk, it never gets traced back to the source.

this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
288 points (99.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1631 readers
352 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS