AnarchyChess

5190 readers

75 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
!Chess@lemmy.ml
!chessbeginners@sh.itjust.works

Matrix space

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

itszednotzee@sopuli.xyz

itszednotzee@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz

395

if this post gets 32 upvotes, i will post again with twice as wide en passant (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 months ago by Rainb0wSkeppy@lemmy.world to c/anarchychess@sopuli.xyz

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, you're right, I'm not being rigorous here. I'm just co-opting big O notation somewhat inaccurately to express that this isn't going to get as big as it seems because the number of upvotes isn't going to increase all that much.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 months ago

I guess I have a different intuition. For me, O notation applied normally shows that it will not get far because it rises exponentially or if you count the steps in relation to the number of users, it's O(log n) which doesn't go high. No need to apply it inaccurately