this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
1029 points (89.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

10786 readers
2676 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Damage@feddit.it 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So, for an European who hasn't been following this: criminal conviction does not bar him from running for president?

[–] ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee 39 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The U.S. Constitution sets out three eligibility requirements for the presidency:

  1. The person must be a natural-born citizen of the United States

  2. At least 35 years old

  3. A resident of the United States for at least 14 years.

There are no restrictions regarding criminal records.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 2 years ago

which is actually good, because otherwise they could convict you for the pettiest shit or simply invent a law to convict you over, thus barring you from presidency when you haven't done anything that people dislike.

the problem now is that there's a large group of people who don't consider "being convicted of fraud" as a reason to stop voting for trump, and in fact will mos likely NEVER find any reason to stop voting for him or whoever the republicans put forward.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

As a convicted felon and resident of Florida, though...he shouldn't be allowed to vote. How could you rub for an office you can't vote for?

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not allowing convicts to vote is itself ridiculous tbh

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't disagree, but thems the ropes.

Wouldn't it be fucking great if he tries to go and vote live on OAN or some shit, and some smug poll worker gets to tell him he can't vote because he's a convicted felon.

Oh man. That'd be better than winning the lottery.

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 1 points 2 years ago

Florida follows the voter laws of the state the felony was tried in. New York allows felons to vote.

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

“But why isn’t there a restriction on criminal convictions for being president?”

A: before now, nobody thought we needed to explicitly write them.

We live in insane times.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

No, the real answer is if criminal convictions barred you from office, it could be used as a political tool by corrupt politicians to prevent their opponents from running.

[–] HighElfMage@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

It's also a safeguard against the reigning power using bogus prosecutions against their opposition, like we see in many authoritarian states.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No it's mostly a giant theater that so far has had zero actual impact on the election. But it makes some cultists feel like the justice system is still intact and definitely proscecutes billionaires.

Trump will get off with some BS excuse like they always do at the end of it.

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This verdict has done the opposite of your claim: make the cultists feel like the justice system is political and not working because they don't like the verdict.