890
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 49 points 5 months ago

I mean its barely about what people here think.

Broadly, Biden supporting this genocide in the way that he has is costing him the election. Acknowledging this doesn't mean you support Trump. Arguing that if you don't support Biden in-spite of this position is headspinning, and some posters here (@PugJesus@lemmy.world ) are doing the work of trying to separate the left from Democrats in this regard.

The problem is that beating/ guilting/ shaming voters doesn't work. It literally never has. Its been demonstrated, over and over again to be a counterproductive strategy.

So what if you've been convinced that its OK for Biden do a little genocide? The whole god-damned point is that other people don't believe the same thing you do, and if you actually want to stop Trump you really only have two options. You can either try to convince voters that a little genocide is acceptable if its coming from Democrats, or you can try and convince Democrats that no amount of genocide is acceptable, regardless of the ally committing it.

Its far more sensible to bring your criticisms to the Democrats in showing that you wont vote for them if they don't shift their positions on Gaza, than it is to engage in a demonstrable failure of an approach to rhetoric to try and shame people into voting for a only slightly less supportive of genocide candidate.

You can move a politician. Every election cycle politicians move positions. I mean fucking hell, look how far the left was able to drag Biden last election cycle! He basically went from a Republican slate of policy positions to something actually on the left. He didn't do this his own; he did this to get elected because that's what the voters wanted. Biden can be moved on this, but blaming voters, especially when you know they are on the right side of the issue, is setting 2024 up for disaster.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 5 months ago

I'm just amazed at the amount they punch left then don't understand why it's always an issue.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

Maybe I've gotten too old and cynical to be surprised by it.

Its been the theme of the modern Democratic party to work diligently to cut off your nose to spite your face.

I mean look at the recent jungle primary in California. Adam Schiffs campaign spent millions supporting Republicans in that primary to avoid having to compete against Katie Porter.

It often seems like Democrats have nothing but contempt for their voters. Its not clear to me that they care. Its only a very very few number of Democrats who are actually responsive to their voters.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 5 months ago

I hate how dirty they did Katie. But not surprised considering she'd actually hold people to account.

(and of course you got banned from the community but pug is allowed to constantly attack people)

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

There were 24 hours of bliss about a week ago when pugjesus was temp banned

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 5 months ago

Just amazed they banned someone for trolling while pug gets to shit and spam everywhere in this community

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 10 points 5 months ago

Frankly I'm a bit alarmed i haven't been banned myself. I can imagine the mod logs are full of complaints at this point

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

The problem is that beating/ guilting/shaming voters doesn’t work.

You forgot to add gaslighting.

or you can try and convince Democrats that no amount of genocide is acceptable, regardless of the ally committing it.

The problem is that there is absolutely no way of "forcing" the (so-called) "Democratic" party on this through "formal" means - if you vote for them and they win, they will simply know that they can get you to rubber-stamp their complicity in genocide. If you vote for them and they lose or you punish them by not voting and they lose, they still won't care - they know that four years of Trump will force you back to the ballots to vote for them in four years' time anyway. In fact, I suspect they are betting on the latter scenario.

You're being pushed up against a wall - a wall that wouldn't be there if you actually lived in a democratic society.

[-] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 17 points 5 months ago

Everyone should block PugJesus for a better Lemmy experience.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 11 points 5 months ago

I'm gonna go touch some grass, i'll pass my baton to you.

[-] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

PugJesus has been a constant wedge between Leftists and Liberals. They only serve to be a terminally online agitator, and whenever it's pointed out that their agitative propaganda only serves to confirm anti-leftist bias among Lemmy.world's liberals and further ruins a broader leftist-liberal coalition, ironically making fewer people vote for Biden, they just mald and disengage.

When I asked what they truly believe, they believe themselves to be a leftist that doesn't agree with Marx's Dialectical Materialism.

They reserve only the harshest criticism for actually existing Socialist movements, such as when they trashed the Black Panther Party, but fight tooth and nail for a nuanced view of Liberalism and Liberal movements against Leftists.

No leftist is pure enough, no liberal impure enough.

It truly makes me wonder if PugJesus has any actual firmly held beliefs or if they just act in reflex.

[-] Nimrod_butts@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

W How is it costing him the election any polls to back this up?

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Nobody thinks a little genocide is okay. Nobody is saying that at all. But it's not a choice between a little genocide and no genocide. It's a difference between a little genocide and a LOT of genocide. When Trump gives his blessing to glassing Gaza with a nuke, will you tell the remnants of the civilians that are left that it's fine because the Democrats will understand now that they should've been harder on Israel?

What is actually more important? Doing what's best for the Palestinians from the options that actually exist, or punishing Democrats?

I'm not any happier than you are about the choices that we have, but wishful thinking doesn't give us a third path. This isn't a movie. To get a third option you'd have to convince at the very least a plurality of the population of the US to vote for another candidate that is gung-ho behind forcing Israel to stop (a proposition that isn't guaranteed even if the US cuts off all support today, by the way). That's a tall order, especially with how well it's going convincing 100 or so people on a Lemmy thread.

[-] Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 5 months ago

Do people think nukes will really happen or is it hyperbole? Jared kushner wants to own beach front property in Gaza.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I mean, for me it's hyperbole, but whether it's a literal nuke or a completely unrestrained Israeli army outfitted with unlimited US weapons, the outcome for Palestinian refugees in Gaza isn't much different.

this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
890 points (78.6% liked)

Political Memes

5413 readers
4193 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS