this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
158 points (91.6% liked)

Apple

17481 readers
6 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oct_opus@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It seems they are not going to make batterie replaceable without a fight. The waterproof excuse is crap, they already don’t give us repairs if the iphone is « water dommage » and they can just make a new water resistant design around the new requirements

[–] Rubanski@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same lame excuse they used for removing the headphone jack... Never forget what they took from us and the shitty trend they started in the industry

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the charging port is the next one to go. Just use wireless charging, roast the battery and buy a new phone when the battery finally dies after a few years. However, if the battery really is replaceable, it’s going to change the economics of this plan.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think so. They would still need a way to connect to the phone for diagnosis reasons and all that, or to connect to it via iTunes.

That's still wired, so they can't get rid of it entirely.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just so you know, the Apple Watch no longer has a diagnostic port. It’s all 100% wireless now. Source

Apple has been tinkering with this idea for a while now, and it’s already in use. Next, they just need to do the same thing with the iPhone, and they’re ready to ditch all cables.

[–] Pyro@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago

NFC or something to that effect can be forced"on" with their special charging connection... Or something like that

Would be horrible for data rates but it could be done

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The waterproof excuse is crap

Yep. Galaxy S5, released 9 years ago with an IP67, removable battery, sd card and headphone jack with a back you could open with a fingernail.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Yep. Galaxy S5, released 9 years ago with an IP67, removable battery, sd card and headphone jack with a back you could open with a fingernail.

Spot on. They boast about how the iPhone is IP68, but IPX7 means...

Protected from immersion in water with a depth of up to 1 meter (or 3.3 feet) for up to 30 mins

There may be a tradeoff, but I'll take this level of waterproofing with a removable battery over being able to dunk my phone under water for 2 hours without a removable battery. Like that's an easy choice.

It's all moot anyway. This is just Apple trying to justify their anti-consumer standpoint of wanting to own the device after it's been bought, like every other fucking manufacturer out there. We will own nothing and we'll be happy about it.