-15
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
-15 points (30.8% liked)
Conservative
385 readers
60 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Just 9 days ago you posted about how corporations are creating a housing crisis and now you're posting about how people affected by the housing crisis should be sent to jail. I don't understand your stance.
Strictly speaking, you dont need to agree with the articles, just want to talk about them.
Wouldn't it violate the rules of this community if a conservative doesn't agree with the article being posted?
Conservatives are not a monolith. Theres libertarians, the religious guys, corporate dudes, gun owners, cyber privacy/open source guys, TERFs, even people who dont really care much for politics but lean right anyways. Being cheeky, conservatives are diverse in thought.
So long as the post is conservative in some way, its generally good to go. (And not instance rule breaking too, but that goes without saying)
I am not the author of the articles. I hope that clears up the confusion
You're trying to paint a narrative with the articles you post.
You are the author of this comment
So I'm still confused. From this comment I'd assume you'd be against people being sent to jail for living in a home they are raising their family in because someone else wants to use it as an investment.
I never made a statement. I posted content for discussion.
So you don't agree with this law change?
I am stating my opinion one way or the other. I post articles for discussion.
I'm trying to have a discussion. What do you think about this law change? I personally believe it makes no sense. Why would the government pay to put people in jail instead of ensure they have access to affordable housing?