20
Israelis critical of the government
(themedialine.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
20 points (79.4% liked)
Conservative
385 readers
57 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
https://www.hudson.org/terrorism/hamas-strategy-depends-maximizing-palestinian-civilian-casualties-douglas-feith
You mean why would I use a conservative source on a consecutive forum? Aka the truth.
You’re not having a discussion. You’re crying about the source.
You didn’t offer a counter. You offered whining about it.
I can’t have a conversation about crying. Offer a counter cite.
No, the reference is good, but you want to whine about it.
It is well known Hamas uses people as human shields. You have yet to counter that.
https://stratcomcoe.org/publications/hybrid-threats-hamas-use-of-human-shields-in-gaza/87
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/03/26/amnesty-international-says-hamas-committed-war-crimes-too/
NATO States it, and Amnesty International states it, yet you don't offer a counterpoint other than but why is a conservative posting a conservative source in a conservative forum.
Rule 2 - my source is a reliable conservative source.
You’re free to counter cite when you’ve refused to do because you know I’m right.
I just cited you nato and amnesty international Both are reliable sources.
It isn’t my job to seek out other sources. I seek out the truth. I just cited three serious to your zero.
Sounds you are arguing in bad faith. That’s where the argument is going
You think amnesty internal is conservative ? That’s trolling.