454
'Ate Seagulls (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 months ago by Godric@lemmy.world to c/okmatewanker@feddit.uk
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kattenluik@feddit.nl 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

As if you wouldn't steal a £30 pound steak if it had zero consequences and no morals attached, besides that I don't think anything deserves to be abused before getting killed and especially not in public with children watching.

[-] DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 16 points 6 months ago

So you're saying he should had been more effective in killing the seagull in front of the kids

[-] kattenluik@feddit.nl 7 points 6 months ago

He just shouldn't have done it, but obviously yes that too.

[-] Wooki@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Obviously a waste of good avian meat

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago

if it had zero consequences

And yet, here there were consequences.

It's just a specific breeding programme and he was culling the failures. #evolution \s

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Exactly, he's helping nature

[-] little_tuptup@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

I don't see where it says he abused the bird before killing it.

[-] Vilian@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

exactly, the swing probably was to get enough speed

[-] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago

Pretty sure it dying instantly in a quick whack is the opposite of being abused

Like no he shouldn't have done that but you're going a little overboard

this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
454 points (93.5% liked)

okmatewanker

613 readers
9 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS