Technology

59385 readers

932 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

168

This Woman Will Decide Which Babies Are Born (www.wired.com)

submitted 7 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

119 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Phlogistol@lemmy.world 112 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I'm having trouble trusting anyone with no scientific background (i.e. no PhD), no published journal articles, and no ethical committee oversight to proceed with a complex problem such as this one.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Theranos : Evolution

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 8 points 7 months ago

Theranos: Genetic Boogaloo.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I would not blindly trust those people either, if they are human they are corruptible as well.

Looking at certain 'scientific background' people they act just like politicians, if you take the time to look into them and their activities.

I am just saying to be criticial and do not treat them like celebrity worship status, because I have done that mistake with politicians as well.

We must stay criticial of people in power and with money/influence.

[–] slumberlust@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Science IS political, at all levels. You can't compete without funding and your institutions will pressure you to perform a certain way.

[–] Phlogistol@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Sadly, I agree. Scientific background does not a good person make. It's just mostly (not always) required to solve problems of this level of complexity.

I'm mostly concerned because of no independent ethical committee oversight which is standard in breaking ground on new research and procedures and is widely practiced in medicine and psychology that I know of. I can't know if this is a fraud, it's not my field, but the lack of any public information on their groundbreaking procedure based in science is also quite concerning.

This article is basically promotional material.