this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
58 points (74.6% liked)

Technology

34892 readers
36 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Because the inherent design of modern AIs is not deterministic.

Adding a progressively bigger model cannot fix that. We need an entirely new approach to AI to do that.

Bigger models do start to show more emergent intelligent properties and there are components being added to the LLM to make them more logical and robust. At least this is what OpenAI and others are saying about even bigger datasets.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 0 points 7 months ago

For me the biggest indicator that we've barking up the wrong tree is energy consumption.

Consider the energy required to feed a human with that required to train and run the current "leading edge" systems.

From a software development perspective, I think machine learning is a very useful way to model unknown variables, but that's not the same as "intelligence".