149
Wikipedia is gauging interest for an extension that uses AI to see if any claim is cited on Wikipedia (meta.wikimedia.org)
submitted 7 months ago by Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A prototype is available, though it's Chrome-only and English-only at the moment. How this'll work is you select some text and then click on the extension, which will try to "return the relevant quote and inference for the user, along with links to article and quality signals".

How this works is it uses ChatGPT to generate a search query, utilizes WP's search API to search for relevant article text, and then uses ChatGPT to extract the relevant part.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dukethorion@lemmy.one 26 points 7 months ago

How would this be different from any browser that has Wikipedia search built in?

[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 15 points 7 months ago

Presumably it would evaluate claims in the text without the user having to do the search. Sounds cool to me.

[-] dukethorion@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago

It says the user has to highlight then click the extension.

I can currently right-click and then click "Search on Wikipedia" in the context menu. I believe this works in both FF and chromium browsers.

Fuck AI.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago
[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 7 months ago

Not sure where the not-working is here.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Where do you see it working? I see the result:

There were no results matching the query.

The extension mentioned in the post is supposed to:

return the relevant quote and inference for the user, along with links to article and quality signals

I don't see any relevant quotes, or links to articles, or quality signals.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 7 months ago

Yeah, because there is no relevant Wikipedia information about what you searched for.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

You are 100% sure that there is no mention of Wikipedia being integrated into Firefox/Chrome in any page? How thoroughly have you checked?

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Due to Russell's Teapot, I cannot be thoroughly sure of that, at least in article space. However, that does not mean your claim stands, unless you find a mention.

In principle, the media has no reason to cover this, so no mention should exist.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 7 months ago

I prefer a floating button next to the text than having to set my default search engine to Wikipedia or downloading an addon that only adds it to the context menu, lol. I need to complete my unholy trinity of levitating context buttons

[-] PlantJam@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

And here I am going out of my way to disable any and all floating buttons.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 4 points 7 months ago

It could run the search in the background

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

It doesn't have a friendly looking duck as a logo.

this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2024
149 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

59385 readers
932 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world