154
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rah@feddit.uk -2 points 6 months ago

objectively good Microsoft OS

ROFL

[-] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Okay, let me rephrase: to the extent that any Microsoft OS could be described as "objectively good," Windows 2000 was the last one of them.

[-] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago

Windows 2000 was a good operating system by any measure. It was rock solid, capable, well-supported, could scale from desktop to large enterprise deployments and everything in between, reasonably secure compared to their previous operating systems, etc. I never did like Microsoft operating systems, but Windows 2000 was actually good. It was a breath of fresh air at the time. We had NT 4, which was stable and reliable, but was limited by a lack of DirectX and became cumbersome in large deployments. Then we had Windows 95/98/ME, which was the garbage that crashed all the time.

[-] rah@feddit.uk -2 points 6 months ago

Windows 2000 was a good operating system by any measure

ROFL

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
154 points (96.4% liked)

Linux Gaming

14926 readers
319 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS