this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
797 points (98.9% liked)

Programming

17669 readers
144 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz
797
Google Tries to Defend Its Web Environment Integrity as Critics Slam It as Dangerous (techreport.com)
submitted 1 year ago by ruffsl@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev
89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Attacks and doxing make me personally MORE likely to support stronger safety features in chromium, as such acts increase my suspicion that there is significant intimidation from criminals who are afraid this feature will disrupt their illegal and/or unethical businesses, and I don't give in to criminals or bullies

Kick a puppy
Get attacked for kicking a puppy
"These attacks make me MORE likely to keep kicking puppies, as I don't give in to intimidation from criminals and bullies that want healthy puppies for their nefarious ends."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] usernotfound@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's some massive misunderstanding about my comment.

I called it a false equivalency because it's comparing both the measures ("stronger safety") and the thing is supposed to prevent (doxing and bullying) to puppy kicking.

That's just emotional manipulation done badly. We all call it out when politicians use pedophiles to warrant Internet surveillance, and now apply it ourselves? I don't know about you, but when I see bad reasoning, I'll call it out. Even if it's done by "my side".

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it was not a comparison, it was an ANALOGY.

"A relationship of resemblance or equivalence between two situations, people, or objects, especially when used as a basis for explanation or extrapolation."

The important word here is resemblance. This is an analogy showing a resemblance, not a comparison.