UK Nature and Environment

580 readers

29 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our spring banner is a shot of Walberswick marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

GreyShuck@feddit.uk

Kim@feddit.uk

298

Public has no right to swim in sea, claims firm that dumped sewage at bathing spot (inews.co.uk)

submitted 1 year ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/nature@feddit.uk

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

South West Water is claiming it has no legal obligation to keep rivers and seawater clean of sewage in its defence against a Devon swimmer who is taking the water company to court.

Jo Bateman, who attempts to swim every day off the coast of Exmouth, is taking legal action against South West Water, claiming its frequent sewage discharges into the sea have taken away her legal right to a public “amenity”.

However, in its defence to Ms Bateman’s claim, seen by i, the water firm states no one has a legal right to swim in the sea.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If it's fine to dump whatever they want into the sea and rivers, what's to stop someone dumping a large amount of concrete directly over their vents? If it happens to fill and block their pipes, that's their problem.

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“sorry but due to increased vandalism in your area, we’re raising your water bill by 50%. feel free to complain to your MP who let us do this on the basis that we made a large donation to his re-election campaign and offered him a cushy director job when he’s finished. also, we’ll be doubling our shareholder dividend this year. thanks!”

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Do you honestly think is NOT filling their pipes with concrete would stop them raising prices by 50%, if they thought they could get away with it?

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sorry right back. Points gun

[–] thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

guns

britain

choose one :(

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I choose guns.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I nether condemn or condone these actions, but if anyone needs cement for whatever reason I have some leftover in the garage.

[–] BakedGoods@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Better to gather up everyone at South West Water, every shareholder, dig a hole to put them in, and dump the cement over them. A more permanent solution to such problems.

[–] CasualPenguin@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Their lawyers

The same ones that made up this stupid defense and have zero need to honor it

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I know it's often a lawyers job to throw anything and everything at the wall to see what sticks, but I feel there needs to be some consequences for bad faith, or in this case inhuman, arguments. Like, it fully reveals the priorities of the company and shows there is significant culture rot.