37
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by t0mri@lemmy.ml to c/foss@beehaw.org

.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 7 months ago

That's a huge bill for a business, and businesses are always looking to cut expenses. Again, its an easy sell

[-] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 7 months ago

What happens when you need to collaborate with other businesses who use O365? The business would also have to spend time updating any legacy documents, templates, spreadsheets and so on. Then you have the IT teams, who will need extensive training so that they can field the inevitable flurry of support tickets and calls. And that's not getting into the support side of things - who do I go to if something breaks in LibreOffice?

I am an advocate for OSS, but there is a bigger picture here, and unfortunately it's not always as simple as just switching over. I wish it was, believe me!

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 7 months ago

Tell the other business to use LO. Shouldn't be an issue because its free and runs on every platform.

[-] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 7 months ago

Y'know, this conversation doesn't seem to be going anywhere, so I will leave it here: if it's such an easy sell, every business in the world would have done it by now.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 7 months ago

It became the default in every business I ever worked at. If that's not the case where you are, perhaps you should look into a mirror and ask why?

[-] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 6 points 7 months ago

If that's your view of it, then you truly do not understand how businesses operate (especially larger companies). "Hey this is free, let's switch to this!" isn't a pitch. There are so many factors to consider: service, support, contracts, deployment, on and on and on. It would be great if every business adopted OSS, but they're not going to. And that's not a failure of one employee to convince a Fortune 500 company, for example, that LO would be a cost-saving measure.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 7 months ago

Call Microsoft about a bug and tell me how well their support works for you. Theres zero benefits to going with MS and a thousand for going with libre

[-] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 4 points 7 months ago

The point is that those "thousand" benefits for LO do not matter. That's simply not how businesses run. It would be great if it were, but it isn't. And your experience as an individual user with MS support is completely irrelevant with regard to business support.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 7 months ago

Theres zero benefits to going with MS

Lol

[-] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 2 points 7 months ago

Call Microsoft about a bug and tell me how well their support works for you.

Pretty well, actually.

[-] Cube6392@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago

Microsoft has some of the best technical support I've ever dealt with TBH. Meanwhile with LibreOffice your technical support is mostly forum diving yourself. If you have a big, competent, it department, maybe that's a feasible thing, but I've never worked anywhere with that kind of capacity

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 7 months ago

No, you can pay for support if you want. And you'll have transparent ticketing systems

[-] Cube6392@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago
[-] LunarLoony@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 months ago

I reported a SharePoint bug to Microsoft yesterday afternoon, and it was fixed by the time I logged in this morning.

this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
37 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17901 readers
4 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS