737
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 74 points 6 months ago

Here's what people want... Good movies and good television. Yeah, originality is great, but remakes can be good too.

I liked the remake of Infernal Affairs (The Departed), Scarface, Cape Fear, Ocean's 11, The Fly, King Kong (Peter Jackson), True Grit, Judge Dread, and The Wizard of Oz (1939) was also a remake. The Fall Guy looks good too.

For TV, there's Battlestar Galactica, Westworld, Cobra Kai, Sabrina, and Wednesday, though different, could fit in there as it's still based on another property.

What people don't want are obvious cash grabs.

[-] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 8 points 6 months ago

I don't think Wednesday should count as remake. Also I want to add The Lighthouse to your list of good remakes.

[-] menemen@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Neither Kobra Kai.

There was a Karate Kid remake and that showed how not do remakes. Kobra Kai was a continuation.

Judge Dredd was also not really a remake.

[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I was hesitant to put Wednesday on there. I guess I was going for stories/characters we've seen before vs. something completely original. Wednesday is more like Cruella. Both good, both original, but based on previous property.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

Hell some of those remarks are better than the original IMO the True Grit remake is infinitely better than the original one, mind you I dont like John Wayne movies and this aint even me being political I fucken love Clint Eastwood movies.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 months ago

The Battlestar Galactica reboot kicked ass where the original was legit campy and crappy. Reboots can be okay, but for one: stop rebooting a great and successful franchise, you already are up against a very high bar.

[-] absentbird@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

💯 the new Dune movies could be considered a reboot, but they're light years better than the 80s movie, which was widely considered a disappointment by fans of the books and a financial failure.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

I'm seeing a resurgence of people liking the '80s version, but it's mostly because of the camp, but also because it's more accurate to the book, until the end. The miniseries is honestly possibly the best version, though most people don't know it exists. The new one is by far the most interesting, and it sounds and looks nearly perfect.

[-] absentbird@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago

The 80s movie is absolutely not more accurate to the book. Duncan Idaho gets shot with a gun, the Fremen had sonic blasters made from 'killing words', the Harkonnen had heart plugs, the ornithopters didn't even have wings. I could go on and on, it went way off text.

The latest movies are much closer to the books, the few changes make total sense for the format of cinema, they don't radically change the tone or mechanics of the setting.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It follows the events better I guess is what I should say. The new one cuts a lot more of it out and adds a lot more that wasn't there. The tone of the old one is totally wrong and the new one is more accurate.

That said, neither are perfect. All of the adaptations make a lot of changes

[-] Lesrid@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago

I think it's funny you use Clint Eastwood to prove you're not politically motivated because he talked to a chair to entertain conservatives while John Wayne on the other hand was a Nazi. Like I get it, you can absolutely disagree with both it's just funny the difference in egregiousness.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 months ago

I like old Clint Eastwood movies in spite of my politics, my dislike of John Wayne movies is further amplified by my politics and the fact he was just an awful person overall. Seriously Waynes death was fucken poetry, getting cancer because he wanted to be Genghis Khan and promptly getting irradiated is fucken poetic.

But yeah both Wayne and Eastwood are/were bastards, If memory serves me right they both said some pretty egregious shit about Sacheen Littlefeather at the 45th academy awards.

[-] Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

One went out to campaign for nazis, the other was one. I don't see a difference.

[-] Specal@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Honestly sometimes we're fine with cash grabs too, aslong as they don't require much attention. For example John Wick is a really fun and easy series of films to watch but you don't need to have 100% attention throughout

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 months ago

I have to say, I recently realized there was a fourth and I hadn't seen the third, and I didn't care for those two. The first on was amazing. The second was good, but started introducing too much gun-magic the third and fourth had lost all the authenticity the first one was known for. The first everyone talked about how it was somewhat realistic and people moved and behaved in a believable way. In the third and fourth everyone is just running around using their jacket to block bullets while firing blindly but perfectly accurately. It got really dumb.

[-] Specal@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

It's dumb, but it's fun, atleast that's the case for me

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 months ago

It's fun, just not what I was hoping the series would become.

[-] daltotron@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, you can kinda tell that as the series went on it started to be more and more a vehicle for really dumb stunts and action sequences. I feel like occasionally we get a movie or set of movies that are just cranked out by like, a production chock full of stuntmen. That's fine, I suppose, it's not unenjoyable, but I do much prefer something in the vein of Heat, or the original John Wick, rather than it's sequels.

A better comparison might even be, like, any Jackie Chan movie, since those are all just basically vehicles for stunt work, but I think a comparison between those and the John Wick sequels is kind of self-evidently not a flattering comparison, for the sequels. Jackie Chan movies tend to have better, mostly self-contained plots, they tend to have much better and more impressive action, and action choreography, even if it's almost intentionally less flashy. Even though obviously most of the stuff in the Jackie Chan movies is unrealistic, it still feels more real, because it's all been actually done, relative to the John Wick movies, which tend to be more full of CGI, and kind of less real as a result of them being kind of, ridiculous murderfests. They become ungrounded.

[-] wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

The second Judge Dread was really good. I wish they would make a sequel.

this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
737 points (97.5% liked)

Movies

7205 readers
143 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS