296
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Donald Trump continues to have a low favorability score among Americans, new polling shows, despite being the likely Republican nominee after winning the lion's share of primaries and seeing off his only remaining rival.

An ABC News/Ipsos survey of 536 U.S. adults, conducted between March 8-9, found that 29 percent have a favorable view of the former president compared to 59 percent who view him unfavorably.

It came after Trump secured all but one of the primaries on Super Tuesday—giving him 1,075 out of 1,215 delegates he needs to become the presumptive Republican nominee—which prompted former U.N. ambassador Nikki Haley to drop out of the race to leave him unopposed. Primaries being held on Tuesday could push Trump over the line.

Trump's popularity has remained largely unchanged since last summer. In similar polls conducted last year, which have a margin of error of 4.5 percent either way, he has hovered around a 30 percent favorability rating.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] knightly@pawb.social -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I can't argue with that logic, except that it relies on a false premise of what I want from the election and an unrealistic understanding of just how little influence I can have on it as a citizen of a non-swing state.

I don't want to see either of the major parties in the white house. Logic suggests that I should make an accelerationist vote for Trump, as his presidency would no doubt hasten the inevitable collapse of the American Empire, or at least its current political establishment. But I can't vote for Trump for the same reason that I can't vote for Biden, the active support for genocide.

I also see voting "against" as a corruption of the principles of democracy. Elections aren't a process by which leaders are selected, that's merely a secondary effect. The purpose of elections is to legitimize the State, a reification of the "implied consent of the governed" that entitles a government to act with authority. But I see our current government as fundamentally illegitimate (as evidenced by our abysmal voter turnout figures), and voting against the worst candidate is still placing a vote of confidence in the government itself.

So, until there's an option that doesn't want to arm rogue states in the middle east, I'll just save myself some time on voting day.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Logic suggests that I should make an accelerationist vote for Trump, as his presidency would no doubt hasten the inevitable collapse of the American Empire, or at least its current political establishment.

This is a terrible gamble and one you are not likely to win. You think things are almost as bad as they can get, that we're close to the brink of some glorious revolution. We are not. Things can get SO MUCH worse. The amount of misery can increase exponentially. Take a minute to process that word, "exponentially". As bad as it is now, it can get twice as bad. And then twice as bad as that, which is already worse than you're capable of imagining. But we're not nearly done yet. We have barely gotten started on our terrible journey. The depths of misery are deeper than the Mariana Trench. We have a loooooooong way to go.

It's not a path worth pursuing unless "things getting worse" is your desired ends, rather than just a means to an end. You will be dead (and likely not of old age) before things get bad enough to reach a tipping point.

The better path, the path involving less human suffering, is the slow and steady march of progress. This path may not excite the minds of heady teenagers, but it WORKS.

[-] knightly@pawb.social -3 points 6 months ago

I'm not happy about it either, but I predicted Trump would win 2024 back in 2018 when the DNC pulled their shenanigans against Bernie and nothing that's happened since then suggests a change in course.

America isn't a Democracy, it merely pretends it isn't an oligarchy.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I’m not happy about it either,

Like hell you're not. This mindset of yours very coincidentally requires absolutely no action on your part. That's what you're happy about.

You're not evil, you're just lazy and trying to justify it.

[-] knightly@pawb.social 0 points 6 months ago

My state has universal mail-in voting, it literally requires no effort.

Pretend I'm happy and lazy if you want, I'll be over here making plans to GTFO the USA.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago
[-] knightly@pawb.social 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

One seems to presume that I would care how some rando on the internet wants to judge my character when my right to continue existing as a trans person is under active threat by my own government...

The "Last Days of the Weimar Republic" vibe has never been stronger.

[-] n1ckn4m3@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

Can't argue with any of your points -- I can only commiserate with the way you feel as I share a lot of the same sentiments. I appreciate the open candor and willingness to have a dialogue about this!

[-] knightly@pawb.social -3 points 6 months ago

Likewise! I love to argue about politics but so many people just get angry when presented with a different perspective. The occasional chat like this is such a treat. ^_^

this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
296 points (93.3% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3634 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS