this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
944 points (94.3% liked)

Comic Strips

23250 readers
1447 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

Rules
  1. 😇 Be Nice!

    • Treat others with respect and dignity. Friendly banter is okay, as long as it is mutual; keyword: friendly.
  2. 🏘️ Community Standards

    • Comics should be a full story, from start to finish, in one post.
    • Posts should be safe and enjoyable by the majority of community members, both here on lemmy.world and other instances.
    • Any comic that would qualify as raunchy, lewd, or otherwise draw unwanted attention by nosy coworkers, spouses, or family members should be tagged as NSFW.
    • Moderators have final say on what and what does not qualify as appropriate. Use common sense, and if need be, err on the side of caution.
  3. 🧬 Keep it Real

    • Comics should be made and posted by real human beans, not by automated means like bots or AI. This is not the community for that sort of thing.
  4. 📽️ Credit Where Credit is Due

    • Comics should include the original attribution to the artist(s) involved, and be unmodified. Bonus points if you include a link back to their website. When in doubt, use a reverse image search to try to find the original version. Repeat offenders will have their posts removed, be temporarily banned from posting, or if all else fails, be permanently banned from posting.
    • Attributions include, but are not limited to, watermarks, links, or other text or imagery that artists add to their comics to use for identification purposes. If you find a comic without any such markings, it would be a good idea to see if you can find an original version. If one cannot be found, say so and ask the community for help!
  5. 📋 Post Formatting

    • Post an image, gallery, or link to a specific comic hosted on another site; e.g., the author's website.
    • Meta posts about the community should be tagged with [Meta] either at the beginning or the end of the post title.
    • When linking to a comic hosted on another site, ensure the link is to the comic itself and not just to the website; e.g.,
      ✅ Correct: https://xkcd.com/386/
      ❌ Incorrect: https://xkcd.com/
  6. 📬 Post Frequency/SPAM

    • Each user (regardless of instance) may post up to five (5 🖐) comics a day. This can be any combination of personal comics you have written yourself, or other author's comics. Any comics exceeding five (5 🖐) will be removed.
  7. 🏴‍☠️ Internationalization (i18n)

    • Non-English posts are welcome. Please tag the post title with the original language, and include an English translation in the body of the post; e.g.,
      Sí, por favor [Spanish/Español]
  8. 🍿 Moderation

    • We are human, just like most everybody else on Lemmy. If you feel a moderation decision was made in error, you are welcome to reach out to anybody on the moderation team for clarification. Keep in mind that moderation decisions may be final.
    • When reporting posts and/or comments, quote which rule is being broken, and why you feel it broke the rules.
Web of Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I love how after all of that saying "not contemporary" "not contemporary" "not contemporary" for stuff written closer in time to what we know about the majority of historical figures that lack contemporary records, just to try and claim the myth that "Christmas is pagan" despite there literally being zero evidence to support that.

What are you referring to as "Passage one". "Trinitarian ideas" literally appear in the Bible. Don't know what you're on about.

Only Chrisitian apologetics consider it to be talking about Jesus. No one else does.

Yeah because if they did then they'd be Christian apologists, won't they? (do suppose you could also perhaps be an Islamic or Mormon apologist if you did, but still)

Let's see it

I just shown you it.

Considering as well paul wrote about how he didn't have sex and hated having money, but the fact you just use really weak arguments that would dismiss the VAST MAJORITY of historical figures if applied to them goes to show the double standards required to achieve atheism.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Decades/centuries later is not contemporary. Half of the sources you listed are further in time than me and you are from the grandfather of George Washington for scale. Why does your god hate you so much that it can't just give you a single secular eyewitness?

I am sorry your Saturnalia didn't go well this year btw.

What are you referring to as “Passage one”. “Trinitarian ideas” literally appear in the Bible. Don’t know what you’re on about.

Of course you don't. When you blindly copy off blogs you miss naunce. Go right now and read the Annuals of the Jews, the complete context, of both passages. And while you are at it read what the Gospel of John really says and Paul while you are at it.

The Trinity is not in the Bible. Trinity-light ideas are in there. The Josphius passage expresses a more refined view of the Trinity that did not exist in 75AD. It also isn't in his writing style, is out of context, expresses Messiah views that go against other things the man wrote, and finally praises Jesus way more than any Orthodox Jewish person would.

But it gets worse. The first time this passage is even commented on is about 250-300 years later. The first person who mentions it existing was known to be pretty credulous and would have spent good money to anyone who had a book with his Lord in it. Additionally we have records of other people referencing that book and arguing about Jesus who don't mention that passage.

The second passage refers to James and just happens to use the exact same words that Matthew did at one point. Hinting that someone who knew the Gospel added this sentence fragment in. Now we have some ideas that James lived to be an old man but if you follow the timeline he would have been in his 80s if that James and him were the same person. Kinda hard to believe they would have even bothered killing a guy that old. In any case even if they had we still have to wonder why the Jews of Jerusalem suddenly like James and rioted over his death when we are told by other sources that he wasnt liked.

If we look at the James passage and take out the three words that clearly are borrowed from Matthew we get a much more straightforward story. A guy named James was some Rabbi and he got killed by another Rabbi during a religious multi-faction civil war and he was well liked by some so a riot happened. If we put those three words in we have the main character syndrome problem where everything revolves around James and at the same time no Roman leader moved against this guy despite decades of following the would be king of the jews.

Occum's razor. The passages are fraudulent.

Considering as well paul wrote about how he didn’t have sex and hated having money,

You are being credulous and I was more referencing the James community plus the 12. There are tiny references to some weird sex stuff going on and for people who claimed to hate money they seemed really good at getting it.

VAST MAJORITY of historical figures if applied to them goes to show the double standards required to achieve atheism.

Misdirection. Stay on topic.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why does your god hate you so much that it can't just give you a single secular eyewitness?

Because then they wouldn't be secular...

I am sorry your Saturnalia didn't go well this year btw.

I had a pretty decent time between the 17th and 23rd of December. But Christmas which was on the 25th far outshone it.

Show me the exact Josephus quote you are referring to so we're on the same page

The Trinity is not in the Bible

‭Matthew 28:19

Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them inthe name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because then they wouldn’t be secular…

Bullshit. If you had a non-christian who wrote down that he saw Jesus he would be a secular disinterested party.

had a pretty decent time between the 17th and 23rd of December. But Christmas which was on the 25th far outshone it.

You know the calendar changed right? Please tell me you know this.

Show me the exact Josephus quote you are referring to so we’re on the same page

No. You didn't come prepared that isn't my fault. There are two passages and a million websites that break it down.

Matthew 28:19

Not seeing the part where it says they are coequal. Point it out to me. Bet you didn't even read what Paul said.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 2 years ago

Bullshit. If you had a non-christian who wrote down that he saw Jesus he would be a secular disinterested party.

You're ruling out basically every historical figure here

You know the calendar changed right? Please tell me you know this.

What specific calendar change are you referring to?

Not seeing the part where it says they are coequal. Point it out to me. Bet you didn't even read what Paul said.

‭John 1:3 ESV‬

All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.

‭John 10:30 ESV‬

"I and the Father are one.”