383
submitted 11 months ago by Dazza@lemmy.world to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 17 points 11 months ago

and he should be considered ~~innocent~~ not guilty.

FTFY. Words have meanings and those meanings are important.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Innocent until proven guilty*

[-] r1veRRR@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

NO! That is how the court system, and therefore the state sees him in regards to punishment and treatment. That does not mean, and has never ever ever ever meant, that being declared not guilty means they are proven to be innocent. Just that there's wasn't evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

This wasn't a US court... Does that apply on London?

[-] c0m47053@feddit.uk 7 points 11 months ago

Yes, the UK justice system works on the same principle

[-] scottywh@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago
[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

Innocent until proven guilty is literally the fundamental basis of our justice system. He is innocent by definition.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
383 points (94.8% liked)

World News

31452 readers
1025 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS