this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
44 points (94.0% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles (Moved to !electricvehicles@slrpnk.net)

3467 readers
1 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

ArchiveA community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It’s what the market demands, for better or worse.

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

It's what plants crave

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No it's what the makers offer

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And why do you think that is?

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Higher profit margin mostly.

A root factor was the CAFE standards excluded trucks so manufacturers built SUV's on truck chassis to comply, and then could put more pollution in them at lower cost, plus again, bigger profit margin.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If there wasn’t sufficient demand then profit margins mean little. Ultimately the driving factor is that SUVs and crossovers are what (American) consumers want. So that’s what is being built.

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Agree to disagree