216
submitted 8 months ago by Pantherina@feddit.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Appimages totally suck, because many developers think they were a real packaging format and support them exclusively.

Their use case is tiny, and in 99% of cases Flatpak is just better.

I could not find a single post or article about all the problems they have, so I wrote this.

This is not about shaming open source contributors. But Appimages are obviously broken, pretty badly maintained, while organizations/companies like Balena, Nextcloud etc. don't seem to get that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 8 months ago

AppImage is a nice way to have an app on an USB stick, remote server or for archival. But for normal app usage, why?

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 3 points 8 months ago

I want to find a way to do this with flatpaks too.

A small GUI tool (a statically linked binary lol) that can be placed on that stick

  • copy the flatpak app and runtime stuff to a folder
  • copy the desktop entry over
  • copy app data when chosen

And the same thing to copy it from the stick to a live system. Should work, probably not haha

[-] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago

TIP: Flatpak have a build-in way for creating USB, check out the "flatpak --help".

But the point is with Appimage all that have to be installed is FUSE, which is expected to be installed on most installs when you go to a friend or work where Linux is used.

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

Oh nice!

Flatpak also works everywhere and appimages are not ported to fuse3...

I mean I want to think Appimages where nice, and they are kinda, but no.

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
216 points (80.7% liked)

Linux

48007 readers
890 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS