5
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by modev@programming.dev to c/hare@programming.dev

What do you think about Hare? I think it takes best from different languages, intentionally or not...

It is simple like C, but safer, and at the same time allows you ~~to shoot yourself in the foot~~ to take control and make mistakes if you want.

Example from this blog post two years ago:

fn io::write(s: *stream, buf: const []u8) (size | io::error);

// ...

sum += match (io::write(s, buf)) {
case let err: io::error =>
	match (err) {
	case unsupported =>
		abort("Expected write to be supported");
	case =>
		return err;
	};
case let n: size =>
	process(buf[..n]);
	yield n;
};

Expression-based syntax and match statements remind me of Rust, but it implemented simpler without options...

Maybe you already used Hare in your project. Interesting to read your feedback...

Do you like it? Why?
Dislike? Why?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 0 points 8 months ago

First time I'm seeing it. From the sidebar

Hare uses a static type system, manual memory management, and a minimal runtime

My question is: what does it provide that C/C++ doesn't? It doesn't seem to provide memory safety, C also has a minimal runtime, C/C++ also have a static type system... does it have better tooling? A package manager?

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

Hare

47 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the Hare community!

Hare is a systems programming language designed to be simple, stable, and robust. Hare uses a static type system, manual memory management, and a minimal runtime. It is well-suited to writing operating systems, system tools, compilers, networking software, and other low-level, high-performance tasks.

© Drew DeVault

🌐 https://harelang.org

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS