1003
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Fox News reported on some new presidential rankings, which purportedly show Barack Obama as the #6 president in U.S. history and Donald Trump dead last, and MAGA was not happy.

Fox News on Sunday posted an article about the new rankings by the Presidential Greatness Project, which Fox describes as "a group of self-styled experts." It states that Abraham "Lincoln topped the list of presidents in the 2024 Presidential Greatness Project expert survey for the third time, following his top spot in the rankings in the 2015 and 2018 versions of the survey."

...

"Rounding out the top five in the rankings were Franklin Delano Roosevelt at number two, George Washington at three, Theodore Roosevelt at four, and Thomas Jefferson at five," according to the report. "Trump was ranked in last place in the survey, being ranked worse than James Buchanan at 44, Andrew Johnson at 43, Franklin Pierce at 42, and William Henry Harrison at 41."

The report states that Obama and Joe Biden "ranked an average of 6th and 13th, respectively, among Democrat respondents, and 15th and 30th by Republicans."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] arc@lemm.ee 21 points 8 months ago

I wouldn't say Obama is a top 10 president but he was a good president.

Meanwhile Trump was objectively a terrible president - a venal, mercurial, criminal narcissist who sold out his allies and whose incompetence managed to kill hundreds of thousands of people during a pandemic and capped off his term with an insurrection. Not enough history has passed to judge exactly where he is in relation to some other terrible presidents but I reckon he'll be in the bottom 3 for sure.

[-] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I think it is less a judgment of how good Obama was buy rather an indictment of how bad (or inconsequential) most presidents have been.

That being said, the executive branch was really only as powerful was it is today rather recently. For the majority of the US existence it was just another bureaucratic office of government.

[-] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago

What are 10 presidents that are better than Obama, according to you?

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

Not the other guy but ill throw out a list of mine.

  1. Theodore Roosevel
  2. Franklin D. Roosevelt
  3. Harry Truman
  4. JFK
  5. LBJ
  6. Abraham Lincoln
  7. Thomas Jefferson
  8. Martin Van Buren
  9. Jimmy Carter
  10. George Washington
  11. Dwight D. Eisenhower

This aint an organized list, just those I considerr better than Obama. Also using Washington is a bit of an asspull on my part but I dont care.

[-] laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Ok, thanks for sharing.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works -4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'd be hard pressed to name 10 presidents that were better...

Edit: would love for someone to give me an actual list (with actual reasons for the non-obvious ones. The only person who even attempted so far didn't name 10, and included famous KKK supporter (member?) Woodrow Wilson, so...

[-] crimroy@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago
[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Go ahead and do it then. I think we're both probably a bit too old for the whole "lul you can't name all of the presidents" shit, but hey if that's all ya got...

Or you can go ahead and do it. Make me look like an idiot.

And tell me why you think the non-obvious ones that you pull out of your ass deserve higher on the list.

[-] arc@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

You might not but there are plenty of lists that do and give their reasons. The likes of Lincoln, Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Washington, Wilson, Kennedy, Reagan, Lyndon Johnson are frequently listed ahead of him and for some obvious reasons. Obama might squeak into the top 10 of some compilation lists, maybe higher if people only consider modern presidents.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Lol Wilson? Ummm...

Also, no way Reagan deserves to be ever close.

[-] arc@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Argue with the scholars who made the lists, not me

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

I mean ok I will...

But I don't remember asking for 10 presidents that scholars think were better than Obama. That's literally their job, I'm sure they could have discussions on the topic for countless hours.

I was asking you, a normal American citizen in the year 2024, to name 9 presidents that were better than Obama (and the reasoning would be nice, but I know the caliber of discussion here, so I won't hold my breath).

Besides, if you're going to put a Wilson on the list, it should probably be Edith, as she essentially ran the county while good ol' KKK Woody was stroked out and incapacitated. Something the public wasn't fully aware of until much later. We have laws governing who assumes control in such situations, but I guess fuck all that shit, right? Good presidents don't lie about being incapacitated while their wife covers for them.

People like to attach Wilson's name/legacy to the League of Nations (which the US never joined, and ultimately failed), and tend to rank him highly entirely for this reason, ignoring all of the awful and racist shit he did. And yeah maybe that was par for the course at the time for rich old white dudes, but that's exactly why he doesn't stand out among his peers enough to be top 10 imo.

TL;DR - I wasn't looking for some scholar's list, but just a normal US citizen in (current year) for a top 10 that is actually well informed and well reasoned, and doesn't include Obama. I think most people would be hard pressed to do so.

At this point I'd be happy to take an average American that can name ten presidents that don't include: Trump, Bush, Obama, Biden, or Clinton.

this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
1003 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19098 readers
5230 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS