524
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MrTomS@lemmy.world 48 points 4 months ago

Given the congress he has to work with, one could argue he's been a better President than Obama was.

[-] aubertlone@lemmy.world 33 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

He's been a better president than Obama was.

It's not particularly close in my opinion.

I'm hella biased, but the SAVE plan and not accruing interest on student loans as long as you make payments is a huge win.

There's no reason they couldn't have done this under Obama....

Edit: just wanted to mention that this restructuring for student loans had absolutely nothing to do with Congress

[-] medgremlin@midwest.social 9 points 4 months ago

The SAVE plan and the rules around PSLF really do make medical school a lot more viable for people like me. Doctors get paid a pittance in residency, and the interest on medical school loans would add up really fast on the old income-driven repayment plans.

[-] aubertlone@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Trust me I fully understand.

I went to med school, finished back in 2018.

If I never step foot into a hospital again it'll be too soon.

I work from home now as a cloud engineer for a large US-based mortgage company.

I'm very happy now. I've already made my piece that my $350,000 in loans can only be solved by making minimum payments for 20 years.

All that being said, a lot of people are in a different boat than myself.

Their loans are much more manageable and I'm really glad they'll be able to pay them off because interest isn't accruing.

Who knows? I make enough now that I'm actually going to have to sit down and calculate whether it's worth it to pay the loans off myself or just make minimum payments for 20 years and have the rest forgiven.

The SAVE plan and interest no longer recruiting is the only reason these possibilities are there.

Otherwise I'd have to resign myself to making 20 years of minimum payments and hoping that forgiveness plan is still in place.

[-] grue@lemmy.world -2 points 4 months ago

In terms of stuff leftists want, Obama overpromised and underdelivered, while Biden underpromised and overdelivered. I'm not sure he actually delivered all that much more than Obama did on an absolute scale, but when expectations ranged from "1994 crime bill guy" to "at least he's not Trump," pretty much any policy that manages to edge past mediocre is a pleasant surprise.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

I agree too. Obama had charisma and was a great speaker, but policy wise Biden is much better.

If Obama was firmer many current problems would not exist today. But it is easier to say now.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Obama had charisma and was a great speaker,

And as we're seeing now with Biden's poll numbers, unfortunately, that's all that matters. Doesn't matter how many good things you do to help people, all that matters is whether you have charisma and a good media relations team.

People are so stupid. Maybe democracy was a mistake.

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Maybe democracy was a mistake.

It probably works fine if the majority of your population doesn't have either CTE from your sports programs, lead poisoning, or something above an 8th grade education.

[-] Rookwood@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Obama was generally pretty terrible. Obamacare was a disaster and about the only good policies he had were around car emissions, which were significant but still. If you factor in the amount of political capital he had in 2009 it's sad really.

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
524 points (77.0% liked)

politics

18059 readers
2892 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS