642

I can't really think of a reason for that as Reddit is hated somewhat equally by "both" sides of the spectrum. It's just something I find interesting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Screwthehole@lemmy.world 344 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not really meaning for this to sound as arrogant as it's going to, but... Lemmy is almost entirely populated by nerds so far.

Nerds tend to be open to tech, maybe a little smarter overall. You know? You can tell by the grammar, the spelling. It's a different group here.

Reality is left leaning, and the stupider someone is, in general, the more likely they are to lean right politically. The rest of the right are the really rich, who tend to be up the psychological spectrum toward sociopathic, so of course they would have no time for caring for others' needs.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 168 points 1 year ago

Reality is left leaning…

It really is. So much of conservatism involves pissing into the wind, and trying to argue against objective truth.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 157 points 1 year ago

Reality is left leaning

I know this was a joke Colbert made, but the truth is the reverse: the left is reality-leaning. It's truly terrifying to see how divorced from reality the right-wing is, and how gleefully they just keep storming in that direction.

[-] JoeCoT@kbin.social 38 points 1 year ago

To an extent. But whenever there is a political discussion on Hacker News, the lib right response is very, very loud, and I try to remind myself I appreciate Hacker News for its tech news.

I think the culture is just different. Lemmy was started and run by Tankies. Hacker News was started by Y Combinator, which incubates silicon valley startups. They're going to attract different audiences, or at least different groups of people who will put up with different politics. I can't claim to be particularly upset about the .ml domains being pulled and the center mass of Lemmy moving away from those instances.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

What's a tankie? I keep seeing it.

[-] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I had to look it up too. Apparently it's an authoritarian leftist. Thinks state-socialism was a good thing. As while most leftists are more of the democratic, market, and anarchist varieties.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 51 points 1 year ago

State socialism is a good thing, what tankies promote is something else, they're fascist that can't accept that fact because it would mean having something in common with the fascists in the USA, a country that they hate so much that they're ready to deny reality to have an anti USA opinion.

[-] bibliotectress@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I'm confused, and you seem to be a lot more familiar with the term. I read the wiki link that explains tankies. I don't personally know any left leaning people who support Russia/Stalin/China regimes. Maybe because of my America-centric viewpoint and where things are today, but typically people who are economically left are also socially and politically left (equal opportunity is more important than individual freedoms), which is very anti-fascist. I've heard people say how great a true communism could be if it were possible, but no one's ever made it past a dictatorship to get there.

Are tankies people who are economically left but socially and politically right, and think someone has achieved a communist utopia without knowing anything about the corrupt oligarchies in Russia or CCP China?

[-] RossoErcole@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The problem is not state socialism, it's the authoritarian side of it. Tankies promote authoritarian views similar to fascists but with a different economics view (not even that different some times), hence they prefer the dictatorships like USSR (in these days even Putin, which is idiotic), North Korea, China; over what they perceive as imperialist, the USA (I agree on calling it imperialistic and disliking it, but not on considering it worse than dictatorships).

I'm a communist which likes state socialism, but what is and was present in those dictatorship (ignoring the authoritarian side which I despise) is state capitalism.

[-] bibliotectress@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Thank you for taking the time to explain! I appreciate you!

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Thanks for explaining for me, that's exactly what I meant, I just didn't have the time to reply!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] riskable@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The confusion comes from so much mass media that equates socialism with communism. They're orthogonal concepts! Saying socialism is the same as communism is like saying beer-making is exactly the same as cheese-making. Anyone who understands what beer and cheese are would be like, "I'm sorry, what‽"

The best way to think of socialism is that's it's a governance strategy that can be used wherever you want. Want everyone to pay taxes in order to fund and deliver government-run firefighting services? That's socialism. Want to do the same with the military? Socialism. Whenever the government is delivering some good or service by way of taxpayer dollars that's socialism.

Capitalism and communism are economic systems. You can have socialist government constructs under either capitalism or communism. It's just that communism doesn't really have the flexibility to provide goods or services in any other way than via the government.

Then there's countries like China that claim to be communist (and the Right loves to call them that) but really, they're more capitalist than communist. What they do have that most communists and fascist governments have is authoritarianism.

That authoritarianism is what fascists and "tankies" have in common: Fascists support an authoritarian, pseudo-capitalist government while "tankies" support an authoritarian, pseudo-communist government.

[-] cloudpunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I appreciate your break down on this, I feel like I get so confused with auth/fasc terms

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

They're authoritarian. Not fascist. There is a difference. Even if both groups are more dedicated to authoritarianism than anything else. I would not be caught dead voluntarily anywhere with a fascist. While I disagree heavily with ML communist I might associate with them a little bit. But just never give them power.

[-] Robaque@feddit.it 8 points 1 year ago

Thanks for not leaving out the anarchists

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Basically authoritarian leftists that are caricaturized as worshipping the Soviet Union

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Thinks Stalin was cool and Lenin was correct to break the short lived democracy of the USSR. The rest is details.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

People who cheer when others point out flaws in USA but start screaming when flaws in Russia or China are pointed out.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] _finger_@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

The super rich are usually highly educated but they live in such a homogenous bubble that they’re opinions on the majority of society should be entirely discounted. They usually have a total lack of empathy for people and vote for politicians with the same attitude. I have met some super rich people who try very hard to go against the grain and not fall into that mindset, but something about the need for protecting your money and lifestyle usually promotes an untrustworthy and skeptical view of everyone in their lives including their own family.

[-] willya@lemmyf.uk 8 points 1 year ago
[-] jaamesbaxterr@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Your username/instance combo is amazing. 10/10

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

That instance is epic lol .uk

[-] willya@lemmyf.uk 5 points 1 year ago
[-] JTode@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think I might want to jump over to lemmyf.uk myself.

Is there a citizenship requirement? Do I have to prove that I find Daleks irrationally terrifying?

I do actually, because they all have Englishmen inside them. I kid, I'm Canadian. Scottish Canadian. Fuckin' wanker. Haha. I love you guys.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

The political vibe on Lemmy isn't really a new thing. Reddit had it 15 years ago. Good forums and IRC channels had it before that. It's been part of the "golden age" of every online social medium

Eventually, teenage edgelords find start taking up too much space. Shortly after that, the far-right turn up to prey on them.

The people who made the platform good in the first place leave and the cycle begins anew.

[-] p5f20w18k@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Just cause I’m a nerd dusnt mean I can spell correctly

load more comments (49 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
642 points (86.4% liked)

Showerthoughts

29525 readers
1138 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS