1087
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Maryland House Democrats introduced a controversial gun safety bill requiring gun owners to forfeit their ability to wear or carry without firearm liability insurance.

Introduced by Del. Terri Hill, D-Howard County, the legislation would prohibit the “wear or carry” of a gun anywhere in the state unless the individual has obtained a liability insurance policy of at least $300,000.

"A person may not wear or carry a firearm unless the person has obtained and it covered by liability insurance issued by an insurer authorized to do business in the State under the Insurance Article to cover claims for property damage, bodily injury, or death arising from an accident resulting from the person’s use or storage of a firearm or up to $300,000 for damages arising from the same incident, in addition to interest and costs,” the proposed Maryland legislation reads.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

So, this only applies to firearms, right? Can I circumvent this by owning a bow, crossbow, sword or one of the cool experimental coil//plasma/laser guns instead? /S

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Railguns aren't firearms. :)

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 months ago

Or a black powder pistol. Don't mind me or my belt full of three Colt Navy 1851s. Guess I gotta start chewing so I can spit like Josey too.

[-] Bgugi@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago
[-] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

So...I just need to replace the gunpowder within each bullet with black powder and I'd be good to go?

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I like where your head is at, loopholes rule, but no I think that the gun has to be the cap n ball kind like the old colt navys or big bore muskets of yore. The trick is those aren't actually legally considered firearms.

[-] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Alright. I guess I should just get a coilgun instead or maybe a repeating crossbow from ye olde times

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

Yes, or the black powder. Warning: Legal use of force laws for your area still apply, so make sure you have the right to send crossbow bolts through an attacker's skull before you do it. Remember, protect life not property (in most areas, if protecting property with deadly force is legal in your area you already know you're in Texas).

[-] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I live in south America xD but thanks. I'll try to get some vintage or futuristic weapons for self defense for the loophole lols /$

[-] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago

Ah damn yeah well then definitely check your laws first lol!

[-] Ibex0@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago
[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Reminds of a few states with magazine capacity bans written so narrowly that they cannot be construed to also apply to belt fed weapons and for the low price of 2000 dollars you can order a part for any AR you own to convert it into a belt fed. Following laws is only for poor people.

[-] SkippingRelax@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Sovcit has entered the chat

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
1087 points (97.8% liked)

politics

18992 readers
2137 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS