575
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 29 points 9 months ago

1900 employees, that's something like 10 big games that won't be released, or we can look forward to more outages and bugs in the new releases, and slower fixing of those bugs.

Thanks Microsoft for your contribution to enshittification 🏅💩

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

I mean, given the quality of product they'd been churning out, I don't know if I'm going to loose sleep knowing we won't get another Diablo Immortal or Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III or Candy Crush Saga any time soon.

Like, if Larian or Nintendo was hemorrhaging talent, I'd be a bit more upset. But between these guys, EA, and Riot turning out flops... Idk, man. Maybe a shakeup that pulls people out of the Micro-transaction Factory isn't the worst thing for the industry as a whole.

[-] kewjo@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

you seem to be blaming the workers for turning out flops but in general it's the managements lack of planning and micromanagement that's the general cause.

no one who's a developer, artist, designer wants to add micro transactions, that comes from top down because it's a revenue generator. they want to polish the games so they can be proud of the work, but are not given time.

executives are not the ones generally being let go and the ones that are will be cashing out from the acquisition. expect those IPs to get worse and have more enshittification because that's what makes money and that's all corpos care about.

you don't get a larian studios from laying off talent, you get it from good management and giving your talent time to deliver.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

you seem to be blaming the workers for turning out flops

I'm sorry if I came across that way. No. I firmly pin this on the dipshits in management.

That said, the worker bees of the gaming industry don't get to decide what a future game looks like. If Microsoft wants Microtransactions, you're making a game with Microtransactions whether that was what you wanted to be doing with your time or not.

These companies falling into disrepair and going into layoff mode means they aren't giant magnets for development talent. In theory, that means fewer games with all the predatory DLC / casino mechanics crap. Smaller staffs mean fewer releases and less of the market clogged with this low effort drivel.

you don’t get a larian studios from laying off talent

Blizzard hemorrhaging talent has already produced a number of new studios. I'm sure Larian has potched talent from its competitors, particularly during the big '00 and '08 layoff waves.

It sucks for the industry as a whole. But getting people out of the old toxic employers and into younger and more ambitious studios is critical in revitalizing a stagnant industry.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 20 points 9 months ago

Not what that word means

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
575 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59415 readers
1527 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS