52
submitted 1 year ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

(Rachel Aiello/CTV News)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

Why is the partnered with no children amount higher than the individual with no children amount? Both of them are just for 1 person because your partner is going to get their own refund aren't they?

[-] jadero@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe, but I don't think so. I think it's being done as an adjustment to the GST rebate and that goes to only one member of the couple.

[-] heartlessevil@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

Oh, I see. Either way it seems to me like it should just be # of adults times $ dollars.

[-] kakes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I don't have children, and my spouse only eats about 1/6 of our food (crumbs, essentially), so it makes perfect sense for the couples rebate to be only that small fraction more than a single person's, rather than being 2x.

[-] jadero@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I agree completely! I think the system sucks, but that's how it currently operates. And always will unless we're going to hit the streets in mass rallies and protests.

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
52 points (96.4% liked)

Canada

7106 readers
321 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Regions


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS