234
submitted 9 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

I legit wonder what would happen if this argument is used ( in a professional way by a professional lawyer ) in a court of law. Like, could this legit be argued to be the same?

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 months ago

I don't see it going well but I'd love to see it happen. "One rule for ye, another for me" and all that

[-] DacoTaco@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago
[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

NAL but technically speaking Ubisoft would lose because they would be unable to prove that they were deprived of anything or anything was appropriated from them with their current stance. Realistically they would just pivot and find some other nonsense to try, like claiming a theft of their computer server’s processing power everytime a pirated game accessed their lobby or some other nonsense that would barely fly, but fly none the less.

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

What if the game was purely offline? Also, how can a pirated game access online lobbies? The last time I pirated a game was because Epic had a BL3 exclusive. And I couldn't matchmake.

I wonder who would have to prove what. Ubi, that they missed profit (because you'd want to buy the game and didn't) or the player (who'd argue he wouldn't ever buy it anyway).

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

There’s a number of cracked games now with online play enabled, you just need to make a burner Steam (etc) account to use it so your main one with purchases doesn’t get nuked if they catch on.

this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
234 points (96.8% liked)

Gaming

19859 readers
141 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS