0
()
submitted a long while ago by @ to c/@
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] petrescatraian@libranet.de 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

@circuscritic Security wise, it does make sense. Supposedly, you still have these documents in original (edit: I mean, in physical format), and you can scan them once again how many times you want. I imagine it would be worse to simply decrypt these and leave them in a random folder somewhere on users' phones in plain sight, available to any app that would read them.

There are plenty of options for encrypting your files anyway.

@FragmentedChicken

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 3 points 6 months ago

I imagine it would be worse to simply decrypt these and leave them in a random folder somewhere on users' phones in plain sight, available to any app that would read them.

Why, did it encrypt and then delete the files that it detected as important when it scanned the device? That's just even worse.

[-] petrescatraian@libranet.de 1 points 6 months ago

@ReversalHatchery I don't have access to the feature but I'm assuming the option was rather opt-in? And now they're sending notifications to everyone affected, so it's not like it's doing anything the users are unaware.

I do agree they could have better explained the reason they're choosing to delete the documents instead of decrypting them.

[-] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago

I hope that's the case.

this post was submitted on 01 Jan 0001
0 points (NaN% liked)

0 readers
0 users here now

founded a long while ago